Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Letter To Editor From Mary Ellen Manning Her Letter Without Editing To The Boston Herald

Mary-Ellen Manning
Mary Ellen Manning

To the editor:

In your June 10, 2011 editorial "Beyond Buffoonery,"
you said that I should be ashamed of myself for
having voted against the Governor's most recent
nominee to the Parole Board because he refused
to disclose the amount of his federal pension.
This is false. I voted against John Bocon because
this administration has put politics ahead of
public safety. Its unschooled approach to
parole will result in an increased number of dangerous felons
being released directly into our communities without
any post-release controls.

I have attached my written statement made contemperaneously
with the vote.

If the basis for this editorial is the June 8, 2011 State House News Service
item, SHNS changed the story at my request to remove the implication
that I had voted against Bocon over the pension issue.
I understand that times are tough economically, but perhaps
the Boston Herald should send its own reporters to the State House to cover
the Council on a regular basis. If not, I suggest that members of the
Herald editorial staff come to the meetings themselves rather
than rely on interpretations of third-party reporting to form their opinions.

Governor's Councillor Mary-Ellen Manning

p.s. Please feel free to confirm what I have said with Kyle Cheney, Mike Norton and Matt Murphy of the State House News Service

Sunday, June 19, 2011

Schribman Dead Wrong On Romney

Post-gazette NOW          SalemNews.com, Salem, MA


So now there is a front-runner. By virtue of mathematics (the money he has raised) and chemistry (the way his rivals treat him), former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts is the leading candidate for the Republican presidential nomination.
There's danger in that position. The GOP field didn't gang up on Romney in their New Hampshire debate this past Monday, but that's only because many of the candidates are just getting their campaign legs and are breathing the sweet air of being in presidential politics for the first time.
Once they feel their political survival is at stake, their restraint will disappear, and one after another they will send arrows Romney's way. Those arrows will provide opportunities for fellow contenders — and will challenge Romney's mettle, providing evidence that he is strong enough to engage President Barack Obama in the general election or raising questions about his suitability as the party nominee.
Sometimes front-runners stumble. Democrat Gary Hart did in 1988, for example, but Mr. Hart's fall was more a matter of personal conduct than political profile.
Mr. Hart was in many ways ideally suited for his party at the end of the Reagan era. He was a Westerner, an apostle of new ideas, no stranger to military issues, nimble in debates and stentorian on the stump. His fall, after an apparent affair with a young woman, was one of the political benchmarks of the era, removing the press's hesitancy to examine the personal lives of politicians and postponing the Democrats in their effort to sculpt a new image for themselves.
Despite the perils in leading the pack, though, it's a lot better to be the front-runner than one of the other contenders. More often than not, front-runners prevail and win their party's nomination: Walter F. Mondale in 1984, George H.W. Bush in 1988, Robert J. Dole in 1996, George W. Bush and Albert Gore Jr. in 2000 are among many examples.
This pattern is particularly strong among Republicans, who, at least in presidential politics, are temperamentally more inclined to respect customary lines of authority and the prerogatives of party elders. Three of their last four elected presidents were respected party figures who had run for the White House before, and the fourth (George W. Bush) was the son of a president, the grandson of a senator, the brother of a governor and himself the governor of the largest state headed by a Republican. Indeed, every Republican nominee for the past four decades, with the exception of Bush and Gerald R. Ford, an appointed but incumbent president, had run for president before.
This factor, along with Romney's bulging campaign treasury and the deference the other candidates displayed last week, underlines Romney's position — a position so commanding that he actually outpolled Obama in the latest Washington Post-ABC News Poll. Indeed, Romney has more than four times as much support in New Hampshire as his nearest rival, former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, who isn't even in the race (yet).
New Hampshire is vital for Mr. Romney, who owns a vacation home in the state and whose primary residence is in a neighboring state. His defeat there four years ago at the hands of Sen. John McCain represented a substantial repudiation, as Massachusetts politicians from John F. Kennedy's time on have prevailed in New Hampshire -- including Ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge (1964), who didn't even campaign and managed to beat Sen. Barry Goldwater and Gov. Nelson A. Rockefeller in a remarkable write-in effort, and former Sen. Paul E. Tsongas (1992). The only exception, besides Mr. Romney, was Edward M. Kennedy, who was defeated by an incumbent president, Jimmy Carter, in 1980.
This time Romney simply cannot afford to lose the state, especially since he has all but abandoned efforts in Iowa, whose caucuses will precede New Hampshire's primary by eight days.
He can explain away a loss in Iowa: He won't have competed, and the contest there is shaping up as a social-conservatism derby that is not to his tastes nor to his strengths. But losing New Hampshire, where he is well-known and where conditions favor him, would be fatal to his presidential hopes — especially since South Carolina, another social-conservative state, is likely to hold the next primary.
Romney was stung in Iowa in 2008 by former Gov. Mike Huckabee of Arkansas, which was bad enough, but losing in his home region to McCain five days later was too much for his campaign to absorb.
The big talk in the last days of spring is the way former Gov. Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota linked Obama's health care plan, which is anathema to Republicans, to Romney's plan in Massachusetts by speaking of "Obamneycare." Pawlenty used the word again at the debate Monday at St. Anselm College, but its long-term effect may be to elevate Romney into a political, if not moral, equivalent of the president — not the sort of tactic that always benefits a challenger.
The health care issue underlines Romney's biggest task, which is to counter the notion that he is willing to change his views with the political breezes. His opponents believe he supported legalized abortion and a health care plan in Massachusetts because the political atmosphere in the state demanded it, and that he abandoned those views once he ascertained that the national political atmosphere required him to do so. Then again, he is being pilloried for his failure to change his mind on global warming.
The result is a political conundrum for Romney as great as any front-runner has had since Mondale was tarred as being the instrument of traditional Democratic special interests, especially organized labor. If Romney adjusts his position on global warming, he will be declared an opportunist. If he doesn't, he will be at odds with a major tenet of the modern Republican creed.
Right now Romney is determined to make sure Republicans don't change their minds.
The health care issue underlines Romney's biggest task, which is to counter the notion that he is willing to change his views with the political breezes. His opponents believe he supported legalized abortion and a health care plan in Massachusetts because the political atmosphere in the state demanded it, and that he abandoned those views once he ascertained that the national political atmosphere required him to do so. Then again, he is being pilloried for his failure to change his mind on global warming.
The result is a political conundrum for Romney as great as any front-runner has had since Mondale was tarred as being the instrument of traditional Democratic special interests, especially organized labor. If Romney adjusts his position on global warming, he will be declared an opportunist. If he doesn't, he will be at odds with a major tenet of the modern Republican creed.
Right now Romney is determined to make sure Republicans don't change their minds.

David M. Shribman, a North Shore native and Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, is executive editor of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
(mailto:dshribman@post-gazette.com , 412 263-1890). Follow him on Twitter at ShribmanPG)
This post can also be found at 


RealClearPolitics
Commentary

Romney is the perceived front runner by the left wing establishment media not the Conservative movement just want to make that clear.

Friedman Confused On Mideast


Thomas L.Friedman
Not only is it an apparent problem with the editorial board at the New York Times it is a problem with their OPED columnists as well.They are both brain dead to the issues of the day in which they choose to comment on this is a common thread among those members of the establishment media and Democrat party.
 In this mornings NYT oped columnist Thomas L.Friedman gets it all wrong on the situation in the Middle East between Israel and the Palestinian Authority.
 His piece of dung this morning "What to Do With Lemons" begins with "While President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have gotten a lot of things right on foreign policy, they’ve made quite a mess in Israeli-Palestinian relations, where they’ve alienated all sides and generated zero progress. They’ve been inconsistent — demanding a settlements freeze then backing down — unimaginative and politically wimpy. Then again, the actors they’ve had to work with were both lemons — a Palestinian government that was too divided to make any big decisions and an elusive right-wing Israeli government that was strong enough to make big decisions but had no will to do so."
  First of all come again that the Obama Administration has gotten alot of things right when it comes to foreign policy yeah ok where Mr.Friedman what the President apologizing for our greatness LMAO! on that one.Hamas are the ones who have caused the division in the PLO and as for blaming the right wing Government in Israel which is the LIKUD party (for those of you who didnt know that especially to you idiots out there on the left) this is to be expected out of an idiot like Friedman.
  Here is another problem "The Palestinian Authority, having lost faith in both Israel and the U.S., is pushing for the United Nations to recognize an independent Palestinian state, within the 1967 lines in the West Bank and Gaza."Thats funny this is what the Obama administration has been pushing as well.Thus giving our buddies Israel a screw job.
  Just by the view on this issue from Friedman he being a Jew obviously should be taking a pro-Israel approach to this issue.But let's not forget that he is a for one a New York Times Oped columnist and a liberal left wing supporter which is one in the same.
  To blame the pro-American/Democracy Government of Israel for stalling the so called peace process is a mockery of a great leader like Prime Minister Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu.

Saturday, June 18, 2011

Reid Doesnot Get It

Harry Reid On Libya: "This Thing Will Be Over Before We Know It"



 

JIM LEHRER:  Senator, welcome.

SENATOR HARRY REID (D-NV):  Thank you very much for allowing me to be on the show.

MR. LEHRER:  Well, first on the Libya military operation, do you believe the War Powers Act requires authorization of further action?

SEN. REID:  The War Powers Act has no application to what’s going on in Libya.

MR. LEHRER:  None?
SEN. REID:  I don’t believe so.  You know, we did an authorization for Afghanistan.  We did one for Iraq.  But we have no troops on the ground there, and this thing’s going to be over before you know it anyway, so I think it’s not necessary.

Commetary

Looks like the Senate Majority leder has his hands full

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Weiner Resigns From Congress

Congressman Weiner quits in lewd photo scandal



NEW YORK (Reuters) – Representative Anthony Weiner, ensnared in a humiliating flap for sending lewd photos of himself to women online, resigned on Thursday, ending a weeks-long scandal that made his fellow Democrats cringe.
"I had hoped to be able to continue the work that the citizens of my district had elected me to do -- to fight for the middle class and those struggling to make it," Weiner told reporters in Brooklyn at the seniors' center where he first announced plans to run for New York City Council 20 years ago.
"Unfortunately, the distraction that I have created has made that impossible, so today I am announcing my resignation from Congress," he said, looking composed in contrast to 10 days ago when he tearfully admitted to online dalliances.
Once seen as a rising star among Democrats and widely expected to run for New York mayor, Weiner made his announcement alone, his wife absent, at a raucous event.
Weiner, 46, represented parts of New York City in the U.S. House of Representatives since his election in 1998. He had established himself as a leading liberal voice in the House. He easily won a seventh two-year term in last November's elections.
Just how big a distraction he had become was evident at his news conference, where he was heckled repeatedly.
Weiner said of his future: "I got into politics to help give voice to the many who simply did not have one. Now I will be looking for other ways to contribute my talents."
Elizabeth Viggiano, a 62-year-old senior at the center, said: "It's heartbreaking. He got caught with his pants down."
Other locals such as Robert Kolowaski, 56, had mixed feelings, calling his actions victimless. "He was very feisty," he said. "He stood up for the people."
Weiner is the third member of Congress this year to step down over a sex scandal.
FALL FROM GRACE
Weiner's resignation marks a remarkable fall from grace for a politician who in 1992 became New York's youngest-ever City Council member, at age 27.
Weiner was known for his forceful debating and acerbic wit. He had powerful friends, too. Weiner was married to Huma Abedin, 35, an aide to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in a ceremony officiated by former President Bill Clinton.
His mentor was New York's powerful U.S. senator, Chuck Schumer, for whom he had worked after graduating from college.
Under pressure from President Barack Obama and both major political parties, Weiner previously insisted he would seek treatment and take a short leave of absence from the House.
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said: "Congressman Weiner exercised poor judgment in his actions and poor judgment in his reaction to the revelations. Today, he made the right judgment in resigning."
A senior Democratic congressional aide said the final straw for Pelosi was on June 8, when additional photos of Weiner emerged.
The aide added that during a call last Friday, Weiner urged Pelosi to reconsider her call for him to resign, citing polls showing his constituents wanted him to stay. "Consider those rose petals to let you go graciously," Pelosi told him, according to the aide.
After talking with his wife, who returned from an overseas work trip with Hillary Clinton on Tuesday, Weiner called Democratic leaders on Wednesday to tell them he would resign, congressional aides said.
At his news conference, he apologized to his wife and thanked her for standing by him.
Democrats are expected to retain Weiner's House seat, which will be filled in a special election.
Ironically, for someone who had successfully used social media such as Twitter and Facebook to boost his political brand, Weiner's fall was prompted when he accidentally posted publicly via Twitter a close-up of his bulging underpants.
Weiner denied for more than a week that he sent a photo of himself in boxer briefs to a woman in Seattle on May 28, claiming his Twitter account had been hacked. But on June 6, he admitted he had lied and had inappropriate exchanges with six women, some after he was married.
MORE LEWD PICTURES
Since then, more lewd pictures of Weiner have surfaced, making him daily fodder for tabloids and late-night comedians. Weiner's name, which also doubles as American schoolboy slang for the word penis, only made matters worse.
In another twist in the scandal on Wednesday, a porn actress said he told her to lie about their exchanges.
Democrats feared that Weiner had become a political liability to their efforts to win back the House from Republicans in next year's elections. Weiner also had been seen as a strong contender for New York mayor in 2013.
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg called Weiner's fall "a lost opportunity" that was "tragic."
Obama ramped up pressure on Weiner to resign on June 14, telling NBC News: "He's embarrassed his wife and his family. ... If it was me, I would resign."
Weiner's abrupt political fall followed resignations from Congress earlier this year by two Republicans, Chris Lee of New York and John Ensign of Nevada, both of whom are married.
Lee resigned from the House on February 9 after it was revealed he sent a shirtless and flirtatious photo of himself to a woman he had met on Craigslist. Ensign resigned from the Senate over his extramarital affair with a former campaign aide.
Weiner's wife was in the early stages of pregnancy with the couple's first child, The New York Times reported last week.

Commentary

Congressman Weiner apologized and resigned because he got CAUGHT period

Nassour Should Shut Up

 GOP, Scott Brown hail verdict’s 2012 reach by Boston Herald Political reporters By Hillary Chabot, Chris Cassidy And Dave Wedge

 


Gleeful Republicans pounced on the corruption conviction of ex-House Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi yesterday — saying they’ll get a boost in 2012 from voters disgusted by the felony convictions racked up by three Democratic speakers in a row.
U.S. Sen. Scott Brown, whose seat is a top target for national Democrats, already has positioned himself as running against Beacon Hill’s “culture of corruption,” and yesterday was quick to blast “the business-as-usual, go-along-to-get-along mentality in Massachusetts politics,” in a statement sent out shortly after jurors read the verdict.
“The facts of this case should be disturbing to everyone who rightly wants and expects honest service from their elected officials,” said Brown, who has blamed single-party rule for boosting arrogance.
Massachusetts GOP Chairwoman Jen Nassour said the conviction will echo in next year’s legislative races.
“There is little doubt voters are getting the sense that DiMasi is just the latest example of a pattern of corruption among Beacon Hill Democrats,” Nassour said. “This proves what we have been saying all along, that the DiMasi-era Democrats have been putting their own interests ahead of the people’s for a long time. Every Beacon Hill Democrat will have to explain why they didn’t do anything to stop corruption.”
Those in the most trouble in 2012, said House Minority Leader Bradley H. Jones (R-North Reading), are reps who re-elected DiMasi as speaker even as the scandal emerged.
“That group of people has more on the political line than anyone else,” said Jones, noting that 135 Democrats cast a vote for DiMasi in January 2009. But Beacon Hill Democrats didn’t seem concerned yesterday.
“I don’t think this casts anything on the rest of the House or the Senate or any other elected official,” said state Rep. Tom Golden (R-Lowell) about the verdict. He said he doesn’t regret backing DiMasi. “While he was here he was doing a good job, and things happen.”
But for all the Republican indignation, Bridgewater State University political professor George Serra said the conviction is unlikely to spur a Republican upset in a deeply Blue state.
“While reasonable people would assume there would be an impact, this is Massachusetts. I just don’t see it happening,” he said.

Here is my Commentary on The herald message boards

DevildogDave

Jennifer Nassour should take along look in the political mirror she is a RINO just as bad if not worse than a Democrat up on Bacon Hill.She is a hypocrite and lastly she is no CONSERVATIVE.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Sal DiMasi CONVICTED!


DiMasi guilty of conspiracy, fraud and extortion

Former House Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi
Photo by Patrick Whittemore (File)
Former House Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi
 
By Laurel J. Sweet Boston Herald Reporter

Fallen and disgraced former House Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi was found guilty today by a federal jury of conspiracy, mail and wire fraud and extortion in connection with a multi-million dollar software deal he tried to shove through Beacon Hill.
In all, the former North End Democrat was found guilty of conspiracy, six of eight counts of honest services mail and wire fraud and one count of extortion.
The jury notified the court it had reached the verdicts shortly before 12:15 p.m. DiMasi glanced back at his wife with a reassuring smile moments before he learned his fate. Once the verdicts were read, the disgraced North End pol stared ahead blankly.
His co-defendant Richard McDonough, 66, was also found guilty of conspiracy and six of eight counts of honest services mail and wire fraud.
A third defendant, Richard Vitale, 66, was cleared of all charges. The judge was told he was free to go. All three men hugged after the verdicts were announced.
“You can’t imagine the emotions that are under the surface when you sit day in and day out with your freedom in peril,” said Vitale’s attorney Martin Weinberg.
DiMasi breached the public’s trust in his leadership when he exploited a software company’s aggressive pursuit of multimillion-dollar state contracts, a jury of his one-time constituents found today.
On their third day of deliberations at U.S. District Court in Boston, seven women and five men ruled DiMasi was out to line his own pockets.
DiMasi was Massachusetts’ first Italian-American Speaker from 2004 until his pre-indictment resignation in 2009.
DiMasi and McDonough, each potentially facing up to 25 years in federal prison, will be sentenced later by Chief Judge Mark L. Wolf.
Between April 2005 and March 2007, DiMasi was funneled $65,000 in bribes by his unwitting law associate of nearly 20 years, Steven Topazio, through a bogus contract McDonough and Joseph P. Lally Jr., a locally based vice president for a Canadian technology company called Cognos, struck for Topazio to be on call if the firm needed corporate papers reviewed.
Topazio, one of three government witnesses granted court-ordered immunity for their testimony against DiMasi, banked $125,000 never doing a day’s work for Cognos. DiMasi’s cut came from the $4,000 he demanded from Topazio’s monthly $5,000 paycheck and from a $25,000 lump sum he bullied Topazio into handing over.
Prior to becoming Speaker, DiMasi oversaw a $211,000 per-year law practice. But when his attention turned full-time to politics, the cases dried up as he amassed tens of thousands of dollars in credit card debt prosecutors said he blew on clothes, fine dining and travel befitting his image as the state’s most powerful politician.
With DiMasi’s help on the Hill, Lally scored millions in commissions selling the state a $4.5 million software license for an education data warehouse for the Department of Education and a $13 million performance management system to permit legislators instant access to agency information.
In return, Lally paid McDonough a total of $300,000 for keeping DiMasi on board with the scheme.
Lally, 50, pleaded guilty in March to conspiracy and honest services fraud in exchange for escaping a money laundering charge and the recommendation of prosecutors that he serve no more than three years behind bars.
In return, Lally paid McDonough a total of $300,000 for keeping DiMasi on board with the scheme.
Lally, 50, pleaded guilty in March to conspiracy and honest services fraud in exchange for escaping a money laundering charge and the recommendation of prosecutors that he serve no more than three years behind bars.
Lally, who is still awaiting a sentencing date, was vilified by the defense team as a self-serving liar and generate gambler for turning on the others with his star-witness testimony for the government.
DiMasi, whose annual $59,422 state pension is now in peril, is the Commonwealth’s third consecutive House Speaker to be convicted of criminal wrongdoing, but the first to be headed for the big house.
His predecessor, Thomas M. Finneran, now the host of WRKO’s (680 AM) morning-drive show, pleaded guilty in 2007 in federal court to obstruction of justice for his role in a racially charged redistricting plan. His agreement with the feds enabled him to skate on a perjury charge. Finneran received 18 months’ probation and a $25,000 fine.
Before Finneran, Speaker Charles F. Flaherty Jr. pleaded guilty in 1996 in federal court to tax evasion. Flaherty walked with two years’ probation and a $5,000 fine.

Commentary

See yeah later Sal!Be a good little #$^&* in the clink.