Thursday, January 19, 2012

ABC Interviews Speaker's Ex

ABC to air interview with Gingrich ex-wife


NEW YORK — ABC News interviewed Republican presidential contender Newt Gingrich's second wife — with whom he's said he has no relationship — and is likely to air the segment Thursday on "Nightline," an ABC News executive told The Associated Press.
That's two days before the South Carolina primary, where the former House speaker is trying to topple GOP front-runner Mitt Romney by casting himself as the more conservative option.
The ABC News executive did not indicate what the ex-wife, Marianne Gingrich, said in the interview. The executive spoke on the condition of anonymity because the plans for airing the interview were tentative.
The interview, should it air before Saturday's primary, would shine a spotlight on a part of Gingrich's past that could turn off Republican voters in a state filled with religious and cultural conservatives who may cringe at Gingrich's two divorces and acknowledged infidelity.
Marianne Gingrich has said Gingrich proposed to her before the divorce from his first wife was final in 1981, and they were married six months later. Marianne's marriage to Gingrich ended in divorce in 2000, and Gingrich admitted he'd already taken up with Callista Bisek, a former congressional aide who would become his third wife. The speaker who pilloried President Bill Clinton for his affair with Monica Lewinsky was himself having an affair at the time.


Commentary

It's all about the timing by the establishment liberal media right before South Carolina primary this week

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Liberal Black On Conservative Black Racism

Obama Pollster Calls Herman Cain "Racist" On TV ... Then Denies It


Daily Caller reports: On Cooper’s Tuesday program, Democratic strategist and Obama 2012 campaign pollster Cornell Belcher took aim at former House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s response to a question from Fox News Channel’s Juan Williams during a Monday GOP presidential debate, saying it was “it was dog-whistle politics at its worst." (first video)

“This is the second time I’ve been on the show with Cornell,” Ari Fleischer said. “Earlier, he said Herman Cain was a racist. Now he’s saying Newt uses these terms, as he put it. And what I hear, Anderson, is actually the opposite.”

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Dems Playing Race Politics Again

Wasserman Schultz: "Natural Home" For Minorities Is Democratic Party



DNC Chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL) appeared on the season premiere of HBO's "Real Time" with host Bill Maher this Friday.

In the Overtime portion of the show, which is broadcasted and available only on the internet, Wasserman Schultz got into race politics, claiming the Democratic Party is the "natural home" for minorities.

Wasserman Schultz says minorities feel "comfortable" because the Democratic Party stands up for "the issues that matter to those communities and Republicans shun them." Transcript below.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz, DNC Chairwoman: "Just look at the chamber at the State of the Union. Look at the side of the chamber that the Democrats sit on and the side of the chamber that Republicans sit on. And you can notice a dramatic difference in who chooses to affiliate as Democrats and who chooses to affiliate as Republicans. The diversity in the Democratic Party is remarkable. We truly are the big tent party."

"There is a reason that the Democratic Party is far more diverse than the Republican Party, because the natural home, politically on major issues to Hispanics, to women, to Jews, to Asian-Americans, the diverse spectrum -- to African Americans."

"The entire spectrum of diversity is comfortable in the Democratic Party because we stand up for the issues that matter to those communities and Republicans shun them.

Commentary

Dr.Rev.Martin Luther King Jr. "Judge me upon the content of my character not my skin color." the Democrats have not and never will learn it as long as they play the race baiting card

Tell Me Who Is The Victim

Bill Moyers: George Soros Victim Of "FOX News Assassins"

Bill Moyers: I’ll tell you somebody you could, you should go for, because he has given more thought to this than almost anyone I know, George Soros, believe it or not.

George Soros, whatever you think about his wealth or his politics George Soros was next 'Vaclav Havel

I think the most catalytic agent for helping to bring to down the Communist government behind the "Iron Curtain." Because he gave everybody who wanted one an equivalent of a Xerox machine, and so they could get the message out and he is deeply troubled by the Orwellian power of the Right Wing in this country today.

He talks about it, I was on his board for a several years and I’m off now that I’m back on the air, but I was on his board and he is deeply troubled.

He is a great debutee of the open society, the society that does change because it listens to itself, and learns from its experience.

He has been the victim, of course, of Glenn Beck and the right wing... the "Fox News" assassins.

So he has thought a great deal of the Orwellian idea and he has said it has arrived in this country it is here part of the permanent character, a permanent characteristic of American democracy which is therefore self suicidally bent because of the power and force of propaganda. He’d be somebody I know would write you a really good piece for that.

Commentary

Sorry Mr.Moyers just go back to your ill-informed show on PBS that no one in their right mind would watch

Hello NYT All ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS Are Here ILLEGALLY!

Opinion/Editorial

I feel like banging my head up against an anvil due to the hardheaded left wing in this country especially when the lead member of the lamestream media's editorial board puts out an OPED such as one this morning.
  Now of all things the New York Times along with every other political issue out there are now alleged experts on immigration it seems.Their second lead OPED this morning "Good Immigration Policy, on Hold."
 All good immigration policy is just enforce the laws that are currently at our disposal.
  But that is not good enough for the NYT."Last summer the Obama administration announced an overdue change in the way it catches and deports illegal immigrants. The head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, John Morton, said the agency would focus more heavily on deporting convicted criminals and other high-risk offenders, making noncriminals a lower priority.
The new strategy did not extend forgiveness or legal status to any illegal immigrants. But it did promise to halt the deportations of many thousands of people — those with clean records and strong ties to the community and who posed no threat, including the elderly, military veterans, college students and parents of young children. Instead the agency would go after convicted criminals, gang members, those who had repeatedly crossed the border illegally and other undesirables."
  Hello NYT all of them are here ILLEGALLY by just crossing over the border so we need to get rid of all of them.No matter how the NYT wants to spin this issue they are on the wrong side of this as usual.None of them have clean records.
  Here is just a liitle truth the Democrats dont want them to go because the ILLEGAL immigrants tend in really grotesque numbers mostly vote for the Democrats.
 It gets better "Friday was supposed to be the day when training of ICE officers in the new policy was finally complete. But there has been a snag: while virtually all of the agency’s lawyers and supervisors have received training, the union representing about 7,000 field agents is refusing to let its members attend the sessions. Its intransigence could slow the new strategy for weeks.
The union president, Chris Crane, says the strategy is preventing agents from enforcing the law. In October, he told Congress the policy was too confusing for agents to understand and would lead to “victimization and death,” for reasons that were unclear.
Mr. Crane has taken his grievances to the hard-right media, complaining to Fox News and Lou Dobbs that his bosses are endangering lives and abdicating their law-enforcement duties. He is conflating all undocumented foreigners with dangerous criminals. But of the nearly 400,000 people ICE deports each year, only a fraction are dangerous criminals; a large proportion are minor offenders or have no records.
 I have to agree with Mr.Crane that all this is is more bureaucratic BS from the liberal big government types let the agents do their jobs.I love it more BS spin and lies from the NYT on 400,000 that ICE deports only a fraction are dangerous criminals.Oh and Fox News is now considered hard-right media ok NYT just expose yourselves even more then if Fox News is hard-right then that makes you hard far out whacked out left media.
 Here is the last paragraph "If the memo is confusing, then Mr. Crane should let his members go to ICE’s one-day training seminars. To us the policy seems like a simple and sensible a way to enhance public safety, conserve law-enforcement resources and lessen the human damage of broken immigration laws. “What I see from my officers,” Chris Shanahan, an ICE officer in New York City, told The Times, “is that they understand that criminal aliens and national security threats should be taken into custody and removed before a single mother, a pregnant woman or someone with small United States citizen children.” That’s simple enough."
 What immigration laws are broken.No sorry NYT they are not broken immigration laws they are just not being ENFORCED! you idiots that would be simple and sensible.
 Still a buch of DUMB ASSES at the NYT especially their editorial board carrying the water for ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.

Saturday, January 14, 2012

Let's Hope It's Santorum Over Romney

AP Associated Press

 Santorum's past comments give Democrats fodderANDREW MIGA, Associated Press

(AP) — Rick Santorum is brash and blunt — and proudly so — but it's a trait that will make it easy for Democrats to use his own words against him if he becomes the Republican presidential nominee.
Far from apologetic, Santorum takes an "I-am-who-I-am" attitude. Lately, though, as he tries to emerge as the conservative alternative to front-runner Mitt Romney, the former Pennsylvania senator has been asking Republican voters to look beyond his verbal missteps.
"I'm a consistent conservative," Santorum often says these days. "I'm not a perfect conservative."
While his latest verbal miscue came as he campaigned in Iowa, his career is paved with them.
National civil rights groups recently thumped Santorum after video surfaced of him discussing Medicaid and food stamps. He appears to say: "I don't want to make black people's lives better by giving them somebody else's money. I want to give them the opportunity to go out and earn the money."
He tried to take it back a few days later, telling CNN in an interview: "I'm pretty confident I didn't say 'black' ... I started to say a word and sort of mumbled it and changed my thought."
Santorum's comments on sex and faith as well as race have led to controversy during his 16 years in the House and Senate and when he was an author, radio talk-show host, think-tank fellow and Fox News commentator.
Santorum once compared homosexuality to bigamy, incest and adultery, provoking a firestorm of protest from gay rights supporters. He also blamed Boston's liberal political culture for the clergy sex abuse scandal that shook its Catholic diocese, drawing a thunderous rebuke from Sen. Edward M. Kennedy on the Senate floor.
All that, and more, is sure to be resurrected if the GOP chooses Santorum to challenge President Barack Obama in the fall.
Santorum nearly defeated Romney in Iowa's caucuses but fared poorly in New Hampshire's primary. He's now barnstorming on friendlier turf in South Carolina, hoping for a come-from-behind victory in its Jan. 21 primary through his outreach to the GOP's statewide evangelical base.
A devout Catholic and a leading voice against gay rights and abortion, Santorum rose to prominence as an unabashed warrior in America's culture wars during his 12 years in the Senate. He lost a bid for re-election in 2006 by a 17-point margin.
Perhaps his most talked-about comment is one that came in a 2003 interview with The Associated Press.
Santorum angered gay rights advocates by saying states should have the right to ban gay sex and by comparing homosexuality to bigamy, incest and adultery. He cited a pending Supreme Court case over a Texas sodomy law and said: "If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery."
He went on to say: "In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That's not to pick on homosexuality. It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be."
Asked about those remarks by CNN recently, Santorum said he did not mean to draw a parallel between homosexuality and the other sexual behaviors he mentioned. "I didn't connect them. I specifically excluded them," he said.
Santorum previously has said his remarks to the AP were in the context of a past Supreme Court ruling on privacy and were not meant as "a statement on individual lifestyles."
It was another issue entirely that earned Santorum the wrath of many Democrats in Massachusetts.
In a July 2002 column for Catholic Online, Santorum wrote that promoting "alternative lifestyles" feeds aberrant behavior, such as priests molesting children.
"Priests, like all of us, are affected by culture," he wrote. "When the culture is sick, every element in it becomes infected. While it is no excuse for this scandal, it is no surprise that Boston, a seat of academic, political and cultural liberalism in America, lies at the center of the storm."
Massachusetts Democrats were outraged. Romney, then the state's governor, called the remarks unfortunate.
A few years later, Democrats went after Santorum during his 2006 re-election bid for statements in his book "It Takes a Family: Conservatism and the Common Book" that they claimed were insensitive to the struggles of two-income families.

Commentary

Santorum may be our only chance to defeat Obama come November

Whacked Out Michael "Moron" Moore Is Obama Losing His Base

Moore Warns Obama: "There Are Enough Pissed Off People That Will Go Somewhere Else"





Michael Moore comes out swinging at President Obama at a Tavis Smiley forum on poverty in America.

Moore feels taken advantage of by Obama and warns him that his support could dry up. Moore tells the audience "don't let Barack Obama play that card of 'where else are you going to go?'

"There are enough pissed off people that will go somewhere else," he said.

Moore also took at a jab at Obama's reelection efforts. "How many people now are saying 'Hey, I can't wait to get back on those phonebooks?'" Transcript below.

MICHAEL MOORE: "They're so desperate to be elected, that [it] is more powerful than the money than they're getting from these corporations is your vote. They can't win without your vote -- and don't let the Democrats and Barack Obama play that card of 'Well, where else are you going to go?' You know? They do not want to do that. They really don't want to do that because hey saw what happened in 2000. There's just enough pissed off people that will actually go somewhere else and can cause a huge ruckus as a result of that. So, they do not have to go back very far to think of an example of what happens when you punk on those who have less. Don't do that, President Obama and the Democratic party. Stand up now.

"Imagine Obama calling a press conference in the morning and going "I have decided that this year I am returning all the money I've received from Wall Street and I'm not taking one dime from Wall Street in this election right now." What do you think would happen? What do you would think would happen? Think about the support he would have. People right now -- how many in here went door to door and phone calls and everything in '08? Ask how many people can't wait to get back on the phone banks? It's not there."

Commentary

I love it keep it coming.I love watching the far far left come unhinged and unglued