Sunday, December 11, 2011

Reasons Why Gingrich Hit The Court

Opinion/Editorial


 


   Well now they are going after the 2012 line up of Republican Presidential candidates today is former House Speaker Newt Gingrich's turn.The title of the second lead OPED in this Sunday's New York Times "Mr. Gingrich’s Attack on the Courts" there is a reason as to why Gingrich is leaning into the courts maybe because of their UNCONSTITUTIONAL rulings and ways.
   It begins in true left wing attack mode "In any campaign season, voters are bound to hear Republican candidates talk about “activist judges” — jurists who rule in ways that the right wing does not like. But Newt Gingrich, who is leading in polls in Iowa, is taking the normal attack on the justice system to a deep new low."
   Well like back in my home state of Massachusetts where the judges on the Massachusetts SJC (Supreme Judicial Court) the states highest court might as well be far left wing political activists in black robes.So the former Speaker has a point on getting on the case of the courts.Pun intended.
   The BS oped continues "He is using McCarthyist tactics to smear judges. His most outrageous scheme, a plan to challenge “judicial supremacy,” has disturbing racial undertones. If he is serious about his plan, a President Gingrich would break the balance of power that is fundamental to our democracy."
   Now for the truth the judges themselves dont follow the Constitution its simple it has nothing to do with Gingrich allegedly using as NYT puts it "disturbing racial undertones" just the left wing media using the race card once again.Balance of power NYT the court has one job to rule on cases brought before them and to determine the CONSTITUTIONALITY of a law once it has become law NOT MAKE LAW FROM THE BENCH!
  The OPED ends with a real doozie a lack of understanding by the idiots at the NYT "Mr. Gingrich also would drag judges before Congress “to explain their constitutional reasoning” in some decisions “and to hear a proper Congressional constitutional interpretation.” Or he would simply ignore court decisions. His ideas would replace the rule of law with a reign of ideology. If he had his way, a Supreme Court that ordered an end to racist segregation policies would become a puppet of the political branches."
  Sounds like a President Gingrich would do the correct thing to me.We hear so much from these left wing holier than thou types at the NYT about "transparency and their perverted form of accountability" it makes me sick to my stomach with moronic statements like "his ideas would replace the rule of law with a reign of ideology."Give me a break.
  Then the NYT OPED board should stop showing their outlandish left wing kook filled remarks.
  
  
      

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

December 7 We Will Never Forget

  Before September 11,2001 there was a day that we Commerated with reverence and to quote President Roosevelt "A day which will live in infamy" the day that the nation of Imperial Japan attacked the US Naval base at Pearl Harbor Hawaii.
 Over 2400 of our brave servicemen were murdered by the Japanese thugs 1100 on the infamous USS Arizona.
 This meant the US entrance into what has become known as Wold War II by the US declaration of war on the nation of Japan it meant we were going to be at war with the punk nations of Nazi Germany and the dictatorship of Italy.

 December 7,1941 a day we will never forget.

God Bless our Pearl Harbor Heroes!

Sunday, November 13, 2011

NYT Board Member Out Of Touch

OPED
  Dorothy Samuels is an American journalist and has been a member of the editorial board of The New York Times since 1984. Samuels writes on a wide array of legal and social policy issues. Prior to joining The Times, she briefly practiced corporate law with a big Wall Street firm, leaving there to pursue her interests in public policy and journalism. For four years, Samuels served as executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, the largest affiliate of the national A.C.L.U


         This mornings hit piece is to show the inequality of same sex marriage something that those on the left want us to believe is equal.Dororthy Samuels obviously a communist and devout leftist cannot grasp the truth which is the light at the end of the tunnel.
         Her NYT OPED is entitled "A Long, Winding Road to Marriage Equality" begins with "The fight for gay rights won important victories in the past few months. In July, it became legal for same-sex couples to marry in New York State. September saw the official end of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy that prevented gay people from serving openly in the military. On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee approved a bill that would repeal the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, the law that bars the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages."
        A fight that needs to come to a head sooner than later before this big lie that is the same sex marriage BS becomes a bigger perversion than it already is.This bill needs to be stopped in the US Senate by the GOP at least those that have a backbone.
        The whining continues "But this remains a country where discrimination against gays is enshrined in most state constitutions."First of all Ms.Samuels not every state is Massachusetts or New York some states have morals to be concerned about.

        

Sunday, October 30, 2011

NYT Board Member Supports Occupiers

Eduardo Porter NYT Editorial Board Member

     Talk about a whack job.This is to be expected as a member of the New York Times Editorial board.
His piece of socialist propaganda is normally where the second lead OPED of the NYT would be on a Sunday would be.
     The title is "Wall Street Protesters Hit the Bull’s-Eye" is pure communist BS.It begins in pure spin mode "Occupiers of Zuccotti Park and other sites around the country have been criticized for the fuzziness of their goals. Their complaint that the privileged few in the top 1 percent are getting a disproportionate share of the nation’s prosperity, however, is spot on."
      Now how about the facts not all of the occupiers are nuts but from what I have seen and the left wing media establishment comparing them to the tea party give me a break.Here in Occupy Boston no surprise the Mayor of Boston and our leftist Governor support these layabouts there have been reports that they have spit on police and disresepected the Rose Kennedy Greenway by stinking it up and trashing the area as well it has also been reported that they have not even sought to get a permit to stage this facade.Not that I am against these folks protesting but follow the law and respect the system this is what the Tea Party has done.
     Here is more of Mr.Porter's rant "Who exactly are the people at the top? They are 1.4 million families that made on average $1 million in 2009, the latest data available. They took a hit from the 2008 financial crisis, but no doubt are regaining lost ground."
    What are we always hearing from the left in their holier than thou preaching social justice to so called equality or their perversion of it.Yes the top income makers make alot but they also pay a higher rate of taxes than the rest of us.Remember the more you make the more they (in this case the Government) take.How is this not fair?
    Here is more facts on the Occupiers I saw an interview conducted by a local ABC news affiliate at  Occupy Boston they were asked about their knowledge of our beloved US Constitution nine different occupiers were asked there were 9 different answers to the question and as far as organized forget about it.
  

    

Sunday, October 23, 2011

One Hand Washes The Other


Opinion/Editorial

   Talk about a waste of time.The third lead OPED in this mornings leftist crapsheet has nothing better to comment on than the Massachusetts legislature on license plates so baby boomers can profess their alligence to its leftist un-American up bringing.
   The New York Times wrote an OPED this morning dedicated to their buddies in the Massachusetts legislature entitled "Boomer on Board."
        It begins "Many drivers like to pay a little extra to profess their loyalty to causes on their license plates, when a bumper sticker is not enough. Massachusetts, a typical state, has specialty plates for the Red Sox, the Celtics and the Bruins, Cape Cod and its islands, children, fish and wildlife, cancer research, right whales and the “Olympic spirit.”Now the Massachusetts Legislature is considering a bill to create a plate for baby boomers, Americans born between 1946 and 1964, the huge demographic group about whom so much has been said and so much will continue to be said until the last member fades away sometime after midcentury.
The bill, sponsored by Sarah Peake, Democratic representative of Provincetown, would charge $30 for the plates and distribute the money to local Councils on Aging “for the purpose of promoting the health and well-being of seniors in the community.”
       It figures a waste of time leftist like Rep.Peake (D-Provincetown) would introduce a bill as such.How about a plate dedicated to Veterans but of course that would be UNPC for those Baby boomers who hate the thought of going to war God forbid.
       I have the perfect symbol for a baby boomer plate
 Do I need to say anymore      

Saturday, October 22, 2011

My Take On The GOP Field Of Presidential Candidates

      To begin with out of this field of candidates for the 2012 Republican Presidential nomination no one is more "Reaganesque" or as Conservative than US.Rep Michele Bachmann (R-Minn) and Godfather Pizza founder Herman Cain.Both are not favorites of the establishment Republican party who left Conservatism behind in the rear view mirror.
     Former Gov.Mitt Romney (R-Ma) is at best a flip flopping fraud especially when he is trying to defend the Universal health care scam that he drummed up to look bipartisan with the far leftist Massachusetts legislature is making out to be the fraud that he is also along with the fact that didnot have the guts to stand up to the empty robes/suits at the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and their UNCONSTITUTIONAL ruling on same sex marriage thus making law which it is not the job of the courts.So much for good ol Mitt being a conservative eh.
    Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has way way too much political baggage behind him that will come back to bite him.Gov.Rick Perry (R-TX) who is more conservative than Romney and Gingrich is weak on immigration coming from a border state he should be stronger against "illegal immigration" than what he has stood for thus far.
   So me being a Tea party leader I think that the GOP needs to stop thinking that we as the Tea Party are going to cower to their every whim and vote for one of their sorry ass excuse for a filed of candidates.

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Krugman On 9/11/11 True Colors He Is Shameless

Paul Krugman - New York Times Blog

 
Is it just me, or are the 9/11 commemorations oddly subdued?
Actually, I don’t think it’s me, and it’s not really that odd.
What happened after 9/11 — and I think even people on the right know this, whether they admit it or not — was deeply shameful. The atrocity should have been a unifying event, but instead it became a wedge issue. Fake heroes like Bernie Kerik, Rudy Giuliani, and, yes, George W. Bush raced to cash in on the horror. And then the attack was used to justify an unrelated war the neocons wanted to fight, for all the wrong reasons.
A lot of other people behaved badly. How many of our professional pundits — people who should have understood very well what was happening — took the easy way out, turning a blind eye to the corruption and lending their support to the hijacking of the atrocity?
The memory of 9/11 has been irrevocably poisoned; it has become an occasion for shame. And in its heart, the nation knows it.
I’m not going to allow comments on this post, for obvious reasons.

Commentary

Gee I wonder why he's not allowing any commentary on this piece of crap writing.