NYT Defenders Of Liberal Leftist HUGE Government

Editorial

  As the title of my blog post this morning clearly states from this New York Times editorial that I am about to expound upon shows their dark side on the issue of Government and their expansion thereof.
 The title of their crap is "Defenders of the Faith in Government."
 It begins in attack mode as always "Wilbur Ross, the secretary of commerce and a wealthy private businessman, was asked for his first impressions of government service. “I thought the quality of people in the government was not as high as it has turned out to be,” he said. “There are actually quite a lot of very good, very serious, very intelligent people wanting to do their best.”

He should tell his boss.

President Trump, ensconced in his scandal-plagued White House, hasn’t paid much attention to the two million federal employees who report to him, unless he’s cutting their numbers, slashing their budgets or wondering on television, “What do all these people do?”

Mr. Trump has barely set foot inside a federal agency since his appalling trip to the Central Intelligence Agency on Jan. 21, when he stood before a wall carved with the names of officers killed on duty, fabulizing about his inauguration crowds. He also visited the Department of Homeland Security in January. This month, after he fired James Comey, the F.B.I. director, the president scrapped a conciliatory visit to F.B.I. headquarters after learning that he would not be welcome. Mr. Trump has spent more time with members of Mar-a-Lago than with members of the federal work force."

  Scandal plagued White House umm I don't think so NYT.

 It goes on the BS rant "That would be people like Phillip Brooks, Byron Bunker, Joshua Van Eaton and their team from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Justice Department, who doggedly investigated Volkswagen’s scheme to evade federal emissions standards and won a record $17.4 billion settlement for car owners and environmental cleanup projects. Or Timothy Camus and the Internal Revenue Service impersonation scam team, a group of Treasury, I.R.S. and other agency workers who unearthed and alerted Americans to a scam that had conned unknowing taxpayers out of millions.

NASA’s Lisa Mazzuca developed a generation of aircraft distress beacons that are better able to withstand crash damage and help rescuers locate victims faster. At the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Vincent Tang and his team developed a low-cost mobile system that allows cities to detect even tiny traces of nuclear materials, to thwart potential terrorist attacks. Justin Sanchez oversaw two projects at Darpa: prosthetic arms that enable amputees to pick up tiny, fragile objects, and an effort to help soldiers with traumatic brain injuries form new memories.

This month, three cabinet secretaries — Steven Mnuchin from Treasury, Dr. David Shulkin from Veterans Affairs and Ben Carson from Housing and Urban Development — joined corporate executives, lawmakers and colleagues in honoring these public servants and some 20 others. They’re finalists for the Samuel J. Heyman Service to America Medals, presented by the Partnership for Public Service, a nonpartisan advocate for effective federal government. The awards are meant to inspire talented people to enter government at a time when that couldn’t be a harder sell."

Mr. Mnuchin declared himself “humbled to see the talent in this room.” Mr. Carson said that even though he’d heard government employees “didn’t work very hard,” he’d discovered that they are “extremely dedicated.” Dr. Shulkin said the finalists “inspire us to be proud to feel a part of the work force, and they make others want to join us.”

Many of its best minds say federal government work, for all its aggravations, can bring vast material and intellectual resources to bear on problems and discoveries that contribute to our national progress and uphold our democracy. A generation of civil servants inspired by John F. Kennedy’s call to ask what they could do for their country found the answer at a federal agency. As they retire, recruitment is hobbled by a hiring freeze and a president so solipsistic he can’t understand, let alone celebrate, public service.

The Partnership for Public Service produces the Best Places to Work in the Federal Government guide based on an annual federal employee survey. The 2016 data reveal that federal employees say they get less respect, fewer incentives and less recognition for superior work than do their private sector counterparts. Shockingly, more than 40 percent say they can’t disclose violations of law or ethics without reprisals by supervisors. And that was before Mr. Trump came on board and started hunting for leakers.

 Obviously the NYT doesn't understand what it means to cut the Pork dumbasses.

 It finally ends "Committed, talented public servants can foil this president’s abuses of democracy. Americans wonder why anyone would join such a government. Better to ask how to encourage the best to stay, and persuade a new generation that there’s never been a more important time to sign up.

  Government employees especially for example the Department of State is just a huge hangout for the left it has been for years and years now.

 

NYT Can They Really Be This Dumb

Editorial

  This mornings lead editorial in the New York Times proves beyond the shadow of any doubt that their editorial board are dumber than a pile of rocks.
  The title "President Trump Tries to Engage the Muslim World" blows my mind at how stupid they are.
 It begins "No American president in modern times has disparaged Islam as much as Donald Trump. From the attempted visa ban on Muslim-majority countries to his campaign claims that “Islam hates us” to his Islamaphobic advisers, the president’s record of hostility is well documented.

So his first overseas trip as president is something of a paradox, with a first stop in Saudi Arabia — a major force in the Sunni Arab world —- that includes meetings with members of the royal family, a summit meeting with other Arab leaders and a major speech on Sunday."

  Umm hello NYT the ban was for Muslim TERRORISTS and the countries they come from you dumb asses.

 It goes on "Does that mean Mr. Trump has changed his stripes? Given his casual approach to the truth and his malleable belief system, it’s impossible to know his true views on Islam. What we do know is that he needs all the help he can get from Muslim countries to fight the Islamic State. If he uses the speech and the trip to set a new tone with the Muslim world, that would be greatly in America’s interest.

The Saudis, who came to loathe President Barack Obama, are falling over themselves to turn the page. Mr. Trump’s decision to visit Saudi Arabia “lays to rest the notion that America is anti-Muslim,” the Saudi foreign minister, Adel al-Jubeir, told reporters early this month, ignoring the fact that the real issue is not whether America is anti-Muslim but whether Mr. Trump is. It was he, after all, who stoked xenophobic fires to win the election."

  Change stripes look in the mirror NYT you need some serious strip changing you fucking morons.

Casual approach to the truth NYT you are the leaders of the leftist FAKE NEWS you wouldn't lnow the truth if it bit you in your dumb asses.

 More bullshit lies "Mr. Obama worked hard to cultivate the Saudi-American relationship, selling the kingdom $115 billion in arms, providing support in the Saudi war against Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen, pushing Israeli-Palestian peace negotiations and making Riyadh his first stop in the Arab world.But the Saudis never forgave him for endorsing the overthrow of President Hosni Mubarak in Egypt; for refusing to intervene directly in Syria against President Bashar al-Assad; and for negotiating the nuclear deal with Iran, its Shiite enemy, even though the deal made the region safer.The Saudis and Mr. Trump appear eager to do business and to forge an alliance against Iran. Saudi Arabia has committed to shifting its economy from its dependence on oil and wants American investment to speed that process, while Mr. Trump’s decision to sell the kingdom an additional $110 billion in weapons provides more business for American companies. This is excessive; in exchange, the Saudis should be asked to make a more serious commitment to regional peace, including a political settlement in Yemen."

  How about some facts NYT I hear crickets chirping.

 It ends "Along with other Sunni Arab countries, Saudi Arabia is obsessed with Iran, which is unquestionably playing a troubling and mischievous role in Syria, Yemen and Lebanon, and the Saudis are pleased with Mr. Trump’s anti-Iran line. But focusing only on Iran ignores the destabilizing activities of Saudi Arabia in Yemen, where Saudi bombs have killed untold numbers of civilians. It also ignores the fact that Saudi Arabia’s conservative brand of Islam has done much to inspire ISIS and other extremists.

Mr. Obama tried to forge a more neutral path, engaging Iran on the nuclear deal and admonishing the Saudis to find a way to live with Iran. There is speculation that the Sunni Arabs and Israel might cooperate in a regional security arrangement. This could be constructive, but not if its only purpose is to ostracize Iran.

With Mr. Trump embattled at home, there’s a real danger that in his eagerness for a successful visit he will agree to almost anything his hosts desire, like more American involvement in proxy wars against Iran in Yemen and Syria. Also, he has shown little interest in human rights and in pressing authoritarian countries to treat their people — especially women, in Saudi Arabia’s case — with respect.

This trip is Mr. Trump’s first chance to act as a global statesman. He will define that role not by accommodating Arab demands but by pursuing a strategy that advances America’s security interests as well as those of its partners.

   NYT keep on dreaming you bullshit Communists

NYT Bonkers Over French Presidential Election Results

Editorial

  Well the results are in from the Presidential election in France and the New York Times is all hot and horny over the results. The title of their lead editorial "France Elects Emmanuel Macron" nuts over the results.
 The horniness begins "The decisive election of Emmanuel Macron, a 39-year-old political neophyte committed to the European Union, economic reform and traditional liberalism, as president of France offered powerful relief to everyone who had feared that France could become the next country to succumb to the wave of populism, nationalism and anti-globalism sweeping through Western democracies.

A mysterious, 11th-hour email hack of the Macron campaign appears to have made little or no difference to the eventual outcome. With projections showing Mr. Macron with more than 65 percent of the vote to 35 percent for the far-right, nationalist Marine Le Pen, his was a victory of hope and optimism over fear and reaction; of a future in Europe rather than in resentful isolation.The victory was remarkable in many ways. When he enters the Élysée Palace to start his five-year term next weekend, Mr. Macron will be the youngest president in French republican history. He will be the first president in decades not to come from one of the traditional parties of the left or right; he formed his own centrist political party, En Marche! (loosely translated as “Forward!”) barely a year ago. A student of philosophy, accomplished pianist, former investment banker and most recently minister of economy under President François Hollande, he had never before run for office.

 The main reason why the NYT was happy in green type above traditional liberalism and committed to the European Union. In red of course the NYT couldn't resist the far right attack on Marine Le Pen.

 It goes on "But dramatic and impressive as his victory is, Mr. Macron faces formidable challenges. He is taking charge of a nation deeply divided, much like the United States, Britain and other major democracies, with many people feeling marginalized by globalization, economic stagnation, an unresponsive government, unemployment, faceless terrorism and a tide of immigrants.That a far-right nationalist like Ms. Le Pen could reach the second round of voting over the established parties, and then collect more than a third of the vote, was stark evidence of the despair of what she calls “les oubliés,” “the forgotten.”

In a victory address before a vast throng of cheering supporters in the courtyard of the Louvre, Mr. Macron acknowledged the divisions in French society and repeatedly invoked the “immense task” that lies ahead. That begins immediately: Achieving any of his goals, which include reforming the stultifying French labor code, a perennial frustration for businesses, and cutting the bloated ranks of public employees, will require another political feat next month when France votes for a new National Assembly. Mr. Macron’s fledgling party plans to run candidates in all districts.

All that lies ahead. For now, there is the satisfaction that despite the breakdown of traditional parties, despite considerable malaise in the French and European publics, and despite the email hack (causing fingers to be pointed at a familiar target, Moscow) French voters were not seduced by nativist illusions and instead chose a youthful and optimistic president who believes that France must remain open, progressive, tolerant and European.

  The New York Times will never ever get it the DUMB ASSES that they are.