This Is To Honor The Victims of The School Shooting In Newtown Ct

                                                Newtown Shooting | The Victims

Charlotte Bacon, 6

Daniel Barden, 7  

Olivia Engel, 6

Josephine Gay, 7

Ana Marquez-Greene, 6

Dylan Hockley, 6

Madeleine Hsu, 6

Catherine Hubbard, 6

Chase Kowalski, 7

Jesse Lewis, 6

James Mattioli, 6

Grace McDonnell, 7

Emilie Parker, 6

Jack Pinto, 6

Noah Pozner, 6

Caroline Previdi, 6

Jessica Rekos, 6

Avielle Richman, 6

Benjamin Wheeler, 6

Allison Wyatt, 6

Rachel Davino, 29

Teacher

Dawn Hochsprung, 47

School principal

Nancy Lanza, 52

Mother of gunman

Anne Marie Murphy, 52

Teacher

Lauren Rousseau, 30

Teacher

Mary Sherlach, 56

School psychologist

Victoria Soto, 27

Teacher

May God be with the families of those lost and please be with the community of Newtown Ct

NYT Way Out Of Line Politcizing Connecticut School Shooting

Opinion/Editorial

 

  Can you believe it the New York Times has to politicize the school shooting in Newtown,Ct they can't even let it be without bringing their socialist bs into it.They can't write and honor the innocent lives that were taken at the hands of evil in fact they don't even call the killer what he is evil.
  Today I am taking excerpts from yesterday's NYT lead OPED "Death in Connecticut" and their leftist columnist piece this morning Nicholas Kristof piece entitled "Do We Have the Courage to Stop This?.
   From their OPED yesterday "Republicans will never do that, because they are mired in an ideology that opposes any gun control. After each tragedy, including this one, some people litter the Internet with grotesque suggestions that it would be better if everyone (kindergarten teachers?) were armed. Far too many Democrats also live in fear of the gun lobby and will not support an assault weapons ban, or a ban on high-capacity bullet clips, or any one of a half-dozen other sensible ideas."
  See they can't let go of playing politics with a tragedy.It goes on "The more that we hear about gun control and nothing happens, the less we can believe it will ever come. Certainly, it will not unless Mr. Obama and Congressional leaders show the courage to make it happen."
  Now from Kristof's piece this morning instead of honoring the lives of those mercilessly taken he gets into this "IN the harrowing aftermath of the school shooting in Connecticut, one thought wells in my mind: Why can’t we regulate guns as seriously as we do cars? The fundamental reason kids are dying in massacres like this one is not that we have lunatics or criminals — all countries have them — but that we suffer from a political failure to regulate guns. Children ages 5 to 14 in America are 13 times as likely to be murdered with guns as children in other industrialized countries, according to David Hemenway, a public health specialist at Harvard who has written an excellent book on gun violence.lawmakers don’t have the gumption to stand up to National Rifle Association extremists and regulate real guns  He gets into numbers and BS statistics about the left's favorite regulation gun control.HOW ABOUT HONORING THE LIVES!
  The NYT continues to wonder why their readership is down so low these are reasons why in which I have covered.

Exposing The Fraud Barbara Anderson

  

November 21, 2012

Anderson: Standing up for Israel

Barbara Anderson The Salem News The Salem News Wed Nov 21, 2012, 03:30 AM EST

“Enough of the silence.
It’s time to speak up.
It’s time to speak out.
It’s time to speak truth.
It’s time to speak on behalf of Israel.”
— Rabbi Baruch HaLevi,

Congregation Shirat Hayam
of the North Shore


Timeout from dealing with the aftermath of the election in Massachusetts, to be one gentile columnist speaking up, speaking out, speaking truth on behalf of Israel.
Sunday evening, Chip Ford and I attended the Israel Solidarity Rally in Swampscott.
We’ve been watching the news reports about the ongoing rocket attacks on Israel by the terrorist group Hamas. There had been 1,300 rockets since January of this year, close to 2,000 more this month; more than 14,000 since 2001, which was our own turn to face the hatred of radical Muslims.
Fortunately, Israelis have their own version of President Reagan’s “Star Wars” program, meant to protect us from an attack by the Soviet Union during the Cold War; their “Iron Dome” has shot down most of the rockets, or Israel would have been wiped off the map as its Arab enemies have long desired.
We Americans wouldn’t put up with, on average, three rockets a day; we would respond as we did in Afghanistan, which harbored the terrorists who attacked us. As I write this, the Israeli army is poised on the border with Palestine, preparing to invade if their air-attack defense doesn’t end the aggression. Meanwhile, pro-Hamas activists rally in some of our cities, blaming Israel for defending itself. Time for all good Americans to speak up and speak out.
I’m not getting into the religious aspect of God giving the Holy Land to the Jews, either before or after the Romans occupied it. The simple historic truth, as far as I can determine it, is this: After Rome, Turkey occupied Palestine. Turkey picked the wrong side in World War I, joining with Germany; they lost. Great Britain, which led the battles in the Mideast, won Palestine and allowed Jews to settle there. After World War II, when aggressive Germany lost again, the United Nations partitioned the area between the Israelis and the Palestinians.
The Arab border countries immediately attacked. Israel won. The Arabs attacked again in 1967 — I remember the Six Day War, which the Israelis won, picking up now-disputed land in the process. In 2005, they agreed to turn over part of the area to the Palestinians. Terrorist organization Hamas used its new space to launch more rockets at Israel. This month, it stepped up the attacks.
So where does history go from here? If Israel falls, terrorism wins; evil wins, as it almost won in WWII.
I do wish the United Nations had given the Jews Germany instead of Israel, and left the terrorists to live in ignorance on their oil. After we taught the necessary lesson in Afghanistan, and once we made (and make) sure that no country has weapons of mass destruction to use against us and our other allies, it would be nice to be out of there. As young Israelis now face death and wounds from an invasion, young Americans and members of the Coalition of the Willing have died and been disabled in the Middle East. Now that the United States is poised to become energy-independent, there is no other reason for us to be there than defense of Israel against barbarians.
As Washington, D.C., tries to find a rational immigration policy, it should start by inviting Israelis to come here, where their brains, industry and courage will enhance the American dream as long as they don’t join the liberal American Jews who vote, incredibly, for Big Government and for gun control.
In the meantime, we prayed at the rally in Swampscott, on behalf of our brothers and friends: “Peace to you, I wish the best for you.” I hope we have this to be thankful for, on our American Thanksgiving Day.
Here is a related item for which I am thankful this week: My nephew (from my second marriage) Benjamin Morse has just published the children’s Bible (Part 1, Old Testament) that he’s been working on for eight years. “The Oldest Bedtime Story Ever” from the Bible Beautiful Series is a joyous work of art. With his two master’s degrees, one in biblical interpretation at Oxford University and the other in modern art at the Courtauld Institute in London, Ben has created an amazing book using his medium of cutout figures and colorful patterns, with whimsical touches like Noah’s family wearing yellow rain slickers, and charming narrative.
He gave me my autographed copy when he was here last weekend. It’s just available at Amazon, I am ordering several for Christmas presents. His mother, Marblehead native Jane Anderson Morse, was one of the first women ordained an Episcopal minister. She died at age 51; her son honored her by using her photo in the cutout of the whirlwind from which God spoke to Job.
Jane got her doctorate on the Book of Job, which remains a mystery to many of us. Yet I’ll end with the Jewish prayer that I always say at Thanksgiving dinner: “Grateful, am I, to You.”

Here was my comment

David Beaupre 3 days ago

All of the sudden Barbara is an expert and supporter of Israel since when.Oh by the way most social conservatives support Israel just to let you know but after all you are a Libertarian no wait a Republican no wait a RINO no wait no wait ummmm who cares what you are you dont even know what you are LOL!

Now here is a column attacking the so called "Kool-Aid" drinking tea party as Anderson calls us

Tea Party movement changing,
but need for fiscal responsibility a constant
© by Barbara Anderson

The Salem News
Wednesday, April 11, 2012

---

It's been four years, yet I remember it as if it were yesterday — the creation of the modern Tea Party movement, which gave patriot activists hope after the disappointing 2008 election.

Before then, the spirit of the original Boston Tea Party had been kept alive by state/local taxpayer groups scattered across America, and the National Taxpayers Union (NTU) and Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) in Washington, D.C. Along with the traditional tax issues, the national deficit and debt issue was addressed by the NTU's Balanced Budget Amendment, and popularized by Ross Perot and his quixotic 1992 presidential campaign, which became the loosely organized United We Stand America.

Not since the Silent Majority elected Ronald Reagan in 1980 (while passing Proposition 2½ here in Massachusetts) had we seen ordinary Americans inspired to outstanding political action as they were with United We Stand.

My partner, Chip Ford, was one of its local leaders, as closely as that word applies to loosely organized groups. He tells a dramatic, sometimes funny, but ultimately very sad story of how United We Stand fell down amidst internal wrangling and the loss of its focus.

So he and I watched with a mixture of excitement and trepidation the rise of the Tea Party movement, happily associating ourselves with these kindred spirits while fearfully awaiting the first internal battle. After a year went by with the Tea Party growing and then another year that brought it unprecedented success in the midterm elections, we started to believe that this time things would be different.

It still amazes me that Tea Party leaders — again, if the word "leader" applies — held it together as long as they did. As executive director of Citizens for Limited Taxation (CLT), I'd spent my share of patriotic holidays tossing boxes of tea into Boston Harbor; now I watched with delight as two bright, energetic young women, Corie Whalen and Christen Varley, organized the Greater Boston Tea Party (GBTP) and held the first Patriots Day rally on Boston Common in 2009.

CLT's associate director, Chip Faulkner, spoke there and at other Tea Party rallies in Worcester and Lowell that day.

One year later, the two Chips and I were in Boston for the GBTP rally with Sarah Palin; last year, Chip Faulkner was there to hear Tim Pawlenty speak. Chip Ford and I attended rallies on the North Shore. Good times, a chance to see old friends and make new ones. But we're no longer comfortable with our social-conservative local tea party.

Faulkner will be speaking at the 2012 rally, which this year is being held in Worcester from 2 to 4 p.m. at 1 Lincoln Square [map] on Sunday, April 15, thereby inspiring the theme "Tax Day Tea Party, Turn the Tide" — referring to the coming election with its related issues of the economy, taxes and the national debt. Other expected speakers are philosophy professor Andrew Bernstein, author of "Capitalist Solutions — a Philosophy of American Moral Dilemmas"; Mary-Alice Perdichizzi, representing a new generation with the Brandeis Tea Party; and Aaron Goldstein, American Spectator contributor.

Unfortunately, the founding Greater Boston Tea Party won't be holding its annual rally on Boston Common; that event was hijacked by social conservatives who disagree with the Tea Party's singular focus on fiscal issues and want to use it to advance their own agenda. By getting a city permit before the GBTP could finalize theirs, the "other Tea Party," or what I call the Kool-Aid Party, forced the fiscal conservatives to celebrate Patriots Day elsewhere.

Corie Whalen is now in Houston, serving as South Central Regional Director of Young Americans for Liberty. Christen Varley is presently with her family in Ohio, though she is still on the GBTP Board; she recently told me "there are people like us all over the country filling in the ranks of activists and local pols who are climbing the ladder and learning. Instead of thinking, 'This is the year we have to win,' I like to think, 'this is just the beginning of our winning streak.'"

Her successor at GBTP is another early organizer, Christine Morabito, who is also involved with the Merrimack Valley Tea Party. She and MVTP/CLT activist Ted Tripp will be in Worcester on Sunday. He and Faulkner will be reminding the crowd that as it pays its taxes on April 17 this year, it will also be celebrating Tax Freedom Day — the day that, according to the Washington-based Tax Foundation, the nation's taxpayers will have paid for government at all levels and will now be working for themselves (though in Massachusetts we will be working to cover our higher state and local tax burden until April 22).

They'll also note that in 1904, when Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes described taxes as "the price we pay for a civilized society," there was no federal income tax, and Tax Freedom Day was Jan. 21. The national debt, now almost $16 trillion, was $26 billion.

America badly needs the Tea Party to help restore civilization; I hope its fiscal conservatives can prevail campaigning on the fiscal issues on which most Americans can agree come this November.

---

Now my commentary

Barbara you have a nerve attacking social Conservatives are you now one with the so called Pro-Israeli column.So what are you A Libertarian,Tea Party Fiscal Conservative what are you.I can put it in real terms you are a fraud you have always been and always will be.

 

How The Left Steals Our Income

This is the perfect example of how the Government steals from us

 

The Truth Has Come After The Election

This describes perfectly where the Massachusetts Republican party has gone over the last 15-20 years of course this pictures shows what has to happen in Massachusetts and around the rest of the country.Liberalism has been at the heart of the Republican party letting to rest like a cancer.
Especially in Massachusetts where Mitt Romney was nominated by the GOP as their Presidential nominee and RINOS like Richard Tisei was the nominee for the 6th Congressional district but lost narrowly to US.Rep John "money launderer" Tierney.

NYT Wanting To Mess Up Our Election Process

Opinion/Editorial





 

    It's just two days away and the New York Times is still showing its left wing thickheadedness by poking its nose into our election process.Ths mornings lead OPED is entitled "Editorial | The Struggle to Cast a VoteUpholding Democracy, Ballot by Ballot."
   Its only a struggle if you idiots in the left wing lame stream media report it that way like back in 2000 with the now household politically correct term "disenfranchised" came into the norm.
   Now to the BS "This year, voting is more than just the core responsibility of citizenship; it is an act of defiance against malicious political forces determined to reduce access to democracy. Millions of ballots on Tuesday — along with those already turned in — will be cast despite the best efforts of Republican officials around the country to prevent them from playing a role in the 2012 election."
  Here we go the NYT wants to talk about responsibility how about reporting the news more accurately without the BS bias.Oh yeah that little scare tactic "it is an act of defiance against malicious political forces determined to reduce access to democracy" all this after President Barrack HUSSEIN Obama talked about revenge.One other point the Black panther party back in 2008 were not intimdating voters at the polls were they espcially when they didnt vote for this fraud Obama  no its a figment of my imagination LOL!
  It goes on "Even now, many Republicans are assembling teams to intimidate voters at polling places, to demand photo ID where none is required, and to cast doubt on voting machines or counting systems whose results do not go their way. The good news is that the assault on voting will not affect the election nearly as much as some had hoped. Courts have either rejected or postponed many of the worst laws. Predictions that up to five million people might be disenfranchised turned out to be unfounded."
  Oh thats right Union thugs never intimidated voters either right oh ok just checking.here in Pennsylvania people have to show their IDS why not scared NYT!
  Now as with everything liberals do there is a racial excuse "But a great deal of damage has already been done, and the clearest example is that on Sunday in Florida, people will not be allowed to vote early. Four years ago, on the Sunday before Election Day, tens of thousands of Floridians cast their ballots, many of them black churchgoers who traveled directly from services to their polling places. Because most of them voted for Barack Obama, helping him win the state, Republicans eliminated early voting on that day. No legitimate reason was given; the action was entirely partisan in nature.

The author of that law, as The Palm Beach Post revealed last week, was Emmett Mitchell IV, the general counsel for the state Republican Party. Under his guidance, party officials in Florida got thousands of perfectly eligible black voters purged from the rolls in 2000, and got a law passed last year that limited registration drives and early voting days. A federal judge struck down the registration limits, but not before they drove down the numbers of new registrants."

  I must have been under the wrong impression that now we have our first as the left puts it "the first African-American President" the issue of race has gone away my bad its now even worse.

  More on the issue of race "One of the biggest attempts to reduce the turnout of minority voters, poor people and others likely to vote Democratic has been the imposition of photo ID requirements, under the guise of preventing nonexistent voter fraud. In Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas and Wisconsin, courts have blocked these laws or postponed them until after the election, but the issue is by no means dead, and Republicans can be expected to continue to press their self-serving case.

In Iowa and Wisconsin, the Romney campaign has given its poll watchers misleading or incorrect information — for instance, that voters should show an ID in Iowa, where none is required — which could create disputes and long lines, most likely in Democratic precincts."

  Im not defending the GOP but the voter id issue is for EVERYONE NYT you idiots.

  Now more election excuses by the NYT "One of the saddest signs of the politicization of the voting process and the counting of ballots has been the armies of lawyers assembled by both parties in the swing states where the vote is likely to be the closest. Much of this would be unnecessary if not for the requirements that Republicans have tried to put in place, which force Democrats to make sure that provisional ballots are not thrown out or mishandled. (In Nevada, Republicans are already preparing their challenge by claiming, with absolutely no evidence, that some machines are malfunctioning in Mr. Obama’s favor.) Public outcry, with support from the courts, may eventually remove these threats to democracy. For now, those who contribute to a heavy turnout on Tuesday will send a message that Americans reject any underhanded effort to place political gain above a franchise for which people have given their lives."

 Oh NYT must I remind you dumb asses but I will anyway circa 2000 the same year you all coined the aforementiond PC phrase "disenfranchised" Democrat nominee VP Al "I invented the internet and Global Warming hoaxer" Gore in Florida election dispute remember dimples hanging chads highered a ton of lawyers before Bush did.

 Im laughing my ass off on this one NYT removing a threat to democracy every time you morons print an unpatritotic OPED you ruin our DEMOCRACY

 

 

  

A See I Told You So

Christie Was the First Choice: the Romney Campaign's Veep Buyer's Remorse

By Connor Simpson | The Atlantic Wire

The Romney campaign officially has Paul Ryan buyer's remorse. Citing "campaign insiders," Politico's Mike Allen and Jim Vandehei report Mitt's first choice for Vice President was New Jersey Governor Chris Christie.
Romney liked Chirstie so much because of his "street fighter" style of politics. He thought Christie would be able to play that "Chicago style" game and that Romney struggles with (and the Obama campaign excels at). Christie was so close to getting the nod that some people inside the campaign thought he had received the offer in July, before Mitt went on his trip to the Olympics. But, ultimately, Christie's brash style and "explosiveness" soured the feeling he'd be a good number two among campaign officials. He would command too much attention, and might be difficult to work with in the White House, they decided. After Romney came back from the Olympics, he decided on Paul Ryan and left the others hanging.
The question becomes: why bring this up now? Why would campaign officials bring up the fact that New Jersey Governor Chris Christie was Mitt's first choice for VP before the election is over?
With the odds looking so slim leading into election day, it sure seems like buyer's remorse. You know buyer's remore is, right? It's when you're choosing between a roast beef sandwich and a turkey sandwich, and you choose one only to realize after the first few bites that you really wanted roast beef. That's buyer's remore. Paul Ryan is a turkey sandwich. Paul Ryan was supposed to ignite the base and win the heartland. Has he done that? Ehn. The most telling evidence that members of Romney's inner circle regret going with the Wisconsinite instead of the hard-charging Jersey boy is this quote:

     “He’d be great anywhere there are ordinary white men,” the official said. “They would have loved him because here’s this straight-talking, hard-charging, in-your-face guy, and he’s a man’s man. Ohio is the only battleground state where Mitt has a net negative gender gap — where his approval among men doesn’t outweigh the president’s approval among women. Chris Christie changes that.”

Christie's spent the last week impressing the centrists and becoming BFFs with the President. We know Romney's been pursuing the white vote aggressively, so that they singled out "white men" shouldn't be a surprise. The good press Chris Christie's received is staggering. So there's the theory that, had they picked Christie and he was on their side through Sandy, Romney might be ahead if the street fighter one was his number two.


Commenatry

I knew it all along that the dumb fat ass RINO Gov Chris Christie was Romney's first initial pick for VP.Good thing Romney didnt pick this fat loser

No Laughing Matter Maher

Maher To Romney Supporters: "Black People Know Who You Are And They Will Come After You"

"If you're thinking about voting for Mitt Romney, I would like to make this one plea: black people know who you are and they will come after you," HBO's Bill Maher said during his monologue on Friday night's broadcast of "Real Time."


Commentary

Where is the tolerance and diversity?..........................................................................................................................

Perfect Political Cartoon Depicting Benghazi Situation Cover For Obama Administration By Liberal Media

Commentary

We all know the truth about Libya

Richard Tisei Fraud Of Massachusetts 6th Congressional District

The following is the official endorsement of the RINO for congress Richard Tisei.From Both Boston Newspapers.

Editorial


 

 

editorial | sixth district endorsement

In a divided era, sensible Tisei brings voice of moderation

October 23, 2012

Republican Richard Tisei

Had US Representative John Tierney not been weakened by a controversy that grew out of his brother-in-law’s illegal offshore gambling operation, voters in the Sixth District might well have returned him to Congress term after term without feeling much dissatisfaction. While he hasn’t proved to be a towering figure in his 16 years in Congress, he has genuine accomplishments and a reputation as a hard worker. And that, in a state where Republicans are outmatched and ambitious Democrats wait their turn instead of challenging their elders, is usually enough to guarantee an incumbent’s reelection.
This year is different. Tierney’s family scandal — and his evasive handling of it — gives voters a reason to look elsewhere. Meanwhile, he has an appealing Republican challenger, a moderate who served with distinction as minority leader in the state Senate. This year, Sixth District voters should elect that challenger, Richard Tisei.
Tisei’s mix of libertarianism and fiscal conservatism makes an excellent blueprint for New England Republicans. Even as the national Republican Party veered to the right during Tisei’s years on Beacon Hill, he avoided hot-button social issues and instead staked out a common-sense, reform-oriented direction for the Senate GOP caucus. That approach eventually yielded results; Tisei and other legislative Republicans were pushing nuts-and-bolts pension reforms, for instance, well before the Legislature as a whole was willing to implement similar ideas.
The kind of bipartisanship that Tisei practiced on Beacon Hill is increasingly difficult in Washington. And to be sure, Tisei’s stances on some issues may be too conservative for some voters. He promises, for example, to work for the repeal of Obamacare. (Never mind that he voted for the Romneycare that inspired it.) But Tisei, unlike others in his party, isn’t in denial about problems with the current health care system, and he’s amenable to compromise. He refused to sign Grover Norquist’s no-new-taxes pledge.
 The pro-Tierney ads and mailers that tie Tisei to GOP vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan’s harsh, unworkable budget plan are based on comments taken mostly out of context.

There’s longstanding evidence of Tisei’s willingness to defy his party and even public sentiment at key points; he voted against rolling back the state income tax from 5.3 percent to 5 percent because he didn’t think the state could afford to do so. He argues that, because he would be the only openly gay Republican to be elected to Congress, he would have a national profile of sorts. He would, and he should use it to press for tolerance and moderation among his fellow Republicans.

The other reason to support Tisei is to underscore the principle of accountability — to make clear that service in elected office is conditioned on leveling with the electorate, and in responding to legitimate inquiries, in a way that John Tierney has not done.
Neither his brother-in-law’s involvement in an offshore gambling operation nor the fact that his wife received significant payments for handling his brother-in-law’s money should, by itself, disqualify Tierney from further service. Yet his insistence that he knew nothing about the matter strains credulity. And his efforts to fend off inquiries into the subject — for instance, by trying to stage-manage how the issue might be discussed in debates — seem high-handed and disrespectful of voters’ legitimate concern.
Over the years, the voters of Massachusetts have generally been reluctant to turn out incumbent members of Congress; the implicit bargain has been that, in exchange for being granted long tenure, they are expected to exert outsize influence on public policy. This approach produced such legislative giants as Tip O’Neill and Ted Kennedy. But while Tierney can be proud of his role in expanding access to college loans and heightening scrutiny of contracts in Afghanistan, his accomplishments aren’t so impressive as to negate his liabilities.
All of this raises a question for Massachusetts voters: Are there any conditions, short of accusations of criminal wrongdoing, under which an incumbent should be unseated by a promising challenger? There should be.
If Tisei replaces Tierney, the GOP challenger will have much to prove — that he can be effective in protecting vital federal research dollars from cuts, that he can be a force for education reform, and above all that he can function effectively in a Republican House caucus that’s pushing ever more to the right. But voters should give him the chance.

                                                            

                                                                      Editorial

A seat at the table

By Boston Herald Editorial Staff
Thursday, October 25, 2012 -

In the 6th District, it’s not just that incumbent John Tierney has overstayed his welcome. It’s not just that he has had an utterly lackluster 16-year career. It’s not just that he has failed to offer up any credible explanation for the blind eye he turned to the criminal activities of his wife’s family — and the obvious benefits that accrued to his own household. It’s not even that he has run one of the sleaziest campaigns for Congress in the state’s history. Although all of that is true, the simple fact is that in former state senator Richard Tisei the district would at long last get the smart, committed representative it deserves.
Tisei is a member in good standing of the Bill Weld wing of the Republican Party who believes, as he put it, “that government should be off your back, out of your wallet and away from the bedroom.” That works for us. As a state lawmaker — and Senate minority leader for a time — he worked across the aisle, something we could use a little more of in Washington these days. But he also led the opposition in 2010 against the hike in the state sales tax.
In short, Tisei has an excellent track record on Beacon Hill and would be a solid supporter on Capitol Hill of responsible measures to curb the deficit and jump-start the economy by relieving small business of the curse of over-regulation. He would bring just the kind of fresh new attitude that is needed in D.C.

     Well in short this is disgusting the Herald following the Globe.Especially when Tisei is not wanted by any of the Tea Parties in the 6th District including my old group the Independence Tea Party of Massachusetts.
     I have to agree with the Herald in principal that John Tierney has overstayed his welcome in Congress but to replace him with a far far left wing not even a Republican Tisei goes beyond boggling one's mind.
    For the Globe to say that Tisei’s stances on some issues may be too conservative for some voters makes me want to vomit Tisei a conservative ok lets wake up now.The Herald had it better Tisei is a member in good standing of the Bill Weld wing of the Republican Party they mean "le Establishment" if I may.
   Funny no mention of the "Transgendered Bill" that he championed in the Massachusetts State Senate.A grotesque piece of legislation if you ask me or anyone with half a brain.
   Yes John Tierney should be repalced but not with Richard Tisei.Why not Bill Hudak or Rick Barton why they were too Conservative for the hacks at the Massachusetts Republican Party and the Greater Boston Tea Party just to name a few names. But the truth has to be told.
   The 6th Congressional distrcit deserves better than Richard Tisei and John Tierney both have identical voting records if  ones does their research instead of relying on the lame stream media.
   Just to bring a bit of truth to light on Tisei back in 1996 Tisei voted against at the time Gov.Paul Celucci's income tax cut but we won't let that get in the way of Richie boy.
   In ending Tisei or Tierney neither one of these two bozo's are good for the 6th District
                   

FoxNews's Bret Baier On Obama's Lies In Libya

Bret Baier Special On Libya: "Death And Deceit In Benghazi"

 

 

Commentary

 

Please watch this special presentation Where is the rest of the lamestream media on this story other than covering Obama's ass

 

 

Obama The Hypocrite

Obama: Romney Needs Cure For "Romnesia"

Barack Obama: The choice between moving backward and going forward has never been so clear. Now that we’re eighteen days out from the election, Mr. Severely Conservative wants you to think he was severely kidding about everything he said for the last year. He told folks he was the ideal candidate for the Tea Party. Now, suddenly, he’s saying, “what, who, me?” He’s forgetting what his own positions are, and he’s betting that you will too. I mean, he’s changing up so much, and back-tracking, and side-stepping. We’ve got to name this condition that he’s going through. I think it’s called Romnesia. That’s what it’s called. I think that’s what he’s going through.

Commentary

We know that you are not a medical doctor thank God for that and about Romnesia the country has been suffering for the last 4 years with all the aches and pains of your Bullshit

Michelle Malkin Correct On Women

Malkin: "Vote With Your Lady Smarts, Not Your Lady Parts"

 

Commentary

 

You go Girl Malkin speaking the truth so much for Obama and the women bit at the last debate 

Both Are Frauds

 

Tierney, Tisei dive right in

In TV debate, congressman questioned on scandal, challenger called 'shameless'

By Jesse Roman Staff writer The Salem News The Salem News Fri Oct 19, 2012, 12:13 PM EDT

NEWTON — It took mere seconds of airtime for moderator Jim Braude of NECN to ask about the gambling scandal plaguing Rep. John Tierney, and the gloves were tossed to the mat last night in a primetime television debate
Republican opponent Richard Tisei pounced on the question — the first asked directly about Tierney’s family in four debates.
“He said he had no knowledge of what was going on, but both of his brothers-in-law contradicted him and said he did know what was going on,” Tisei said, referring to the multimillion-dollar offshore gambling scheme that Tierney’s brothers-in-law were running in Antigua.
Tisei then hammered the congressman on his trip to Antigua to visit brother-in-law Robert Eremian, “in the middle of the gambling operation,” as well as the $220,000 in gifts the congressman’s wife, Patrice Tierney, received from her now-fugitive brother when she managed a multimillion-dollar account for him in Salem.
“I do think there should be a congressional investigation,” Tisei said when asked if Tierney did anything illegal.
The congressman, who has been hounded by the scandal since his wife was charged with filing faulty tax returns for her brother in 2010, responded sternly.
“My two brothers-in-law didn’t say that, when the (Boston) Globe went down to visit my brother-in-law down there, he had nothing to offer them in terms of that,” Tierney said. When confronted that one of his brothers in-law, Daniel Eremian, told a Salem News reporter that Tierney “knew everything” about the operation, the congressman replied, “You can take his word, or you can take mine.”
As he has throughout the campaign, Tierney noted that the judge in his wife’s case — in which she pleaded guilty to being “willfully blind” to the true nature of her brother’s operation — said at one point that Tierney is “‘not implicated in any way, shape or form,’ and he’s right on this,” Tierney said.
Tisei challenged that claim, saying that Judge William Young “never cleared you of anything.”
“Judge Young said the congressman has nothing to do with this, meaning the sentencing hearing, he wasn’t looking at the whole thing,” Tisei said. He noted several news organizations who have called Tierney’s use of the judge’s quote “misleading.”
Tierney again went on the offensive.
“Misleading? Richard, you have lied and used insinuation and innuendo on this whole thing and spent $3 million doing it. My wife paid a terrible price on that; she took responsibility for not knowing on that,” he said. “Your naked ambition has let you take her and do this to her because you want a seat that you otherwise couldn’t get. You can’t run on the issues, Richard. You don’t have a clue about what it takes to be a member of Congress. ... Richard, you’re shameless.”
The heated discussion continued when Tisei brought up the approximately $220,000 that federal prosecutors said Patrice Tierney received from Eremian in gifts, which has never appeared on tax returns or congressional financial disclosure forms.
“You’ve known two years money that came into your household was from an illegal source, why haven’t you given up the money?” Tisei asked directly of the congressman.
“Because you’ve known for two years that that amount of money never came into my household, that that amount of money is fabricated,” Tierney said. “There is no implication my wife ever did anything wrong with her taxes or my taxes.”
In court, Patrice Tierney acknowledged that she received the gifts from her brother.
Tisei and Republicans have made the gambling scandal a central theme of the campaign for the 6th District congressional seat.
The Tierney campaign has made Tisei’s party affiliation its theme, saying that electing Tisei would empower right-wing Republicans in Congress.
When Tierney was asked to defend his labeling of Tisei as “an extremist,” the congressman said the first vote Tisei would take would be to put Republican leaders back in charge.
“He said he would put the same leadership in there that is in there now, the same people who have voted against women’s rights, against equal rights, against the middle class, for voucherizing Medicare ... and one thing after another,” Tierney said. “What sense is it, Jim, to say you’re a moderate or to say that you wouldn’t do these things, but your first act would be to go down there and put these people in charge of the agenda?”
As he has throughout the campaign, Tisei insisted last night that he would vote in the best interest of constituents, not with Republican leadership.
Tisei reiterated that he would not have voted for Paul Ryan’s Republican budget, but reiterated that it “it’s a good start,” a quote the Tierney camp has used to criticize him in the past.
“You have to have a plan in place ... the country is in so much trouble right now, nobody is talking, nobody is sitting down, nobody is trying to work together,” Tisei said, adding that he also thought the Simpson-Bowles deficit reduction plan was a good start.
“They will kick you to the curb so fast,” Tierney said of Tisei’s pledge to be an independent voice in Congress.
“In the state Senate, he was totally irrelevant, he and four others being led to oblivion, they did whatever the majority said they were going to do, and that’s where he’d be in this Republican group, he’d be in oblivion,” Tierney said.
The candidates did find some common ground last night.
Both support state ballot questions allowing assisted suicide for terminally ill patients and allowing medicinal marijuana. Both said they would support a federal assault weapons ban.
When asked to offer something each has done well in their legislative careers, both offered that the other has done a good job fighting for equality.
The candidates also sparred on taxes, health care, equal pay for women and the economy in the 30-minute debate, which aired on NECN.
Libertarian candidate Daniel Fishman was not invited to the debate.
The election is Nov. 6.

Commentary

Notice that Dan Fishman was not invited gee I wonder why

David AxelFraud Axelrod On Fox News

Axelrod: Romney "Working Hard To Exploit" Terror Attack In Libya

Obama Senior Campaign Manager David Axelrod and Fox News Sunday's Chris Wallace discuss Obama Deputy Campaign Manager Stephanie Cutter's statement that the "entire reason" September 11, 2012 attack in Libya has become a political issue is because of Mitt Romney.

Commentary

David Axelrod looks as if seen a ghost

Hey,Ditz Does Anyone Really Care?

Opinion/Editorial

Maureen "the Ditz" Dowd

 

 This morning I am going a different route than the usual im going after the bimbo of the New York Times Editorial pages something that I haven't done in awhile Maureen "the Ditz" Dowd.Her column this morning is entitled "An Irish Catholic Wake-Up." Not being known for common sense she begins her column "NOW you know what Thanksgiving with my family is like.A donnybrook with Irish Catholic uncles and nephews interrupting one another, mocking one another, arguing over one another, bombastically denouncing every political opinion except their own as malarkey."
  Sounds like  a typical left wing liberal gathering to me.Now she's making up BS excuses as to why Obama got his ass kicked in his debate and why VP Biden got his handed to him "The loser of the vice-presidential debate was, of course, Barack Obama. In contrast to the pair on the undercard slugging it out, the president’s limp performance the other night was even more inexplicable and inexcusable. The president was no doubt warned not to sigh, but his entire demeanor was a sigh.

The fact that one diffident debate by the president could throw his whole race into crisis shows that nobody madly loves Obama anymore. With his aloof presidency, he shook off the deep attachments from 2008, and now his support lacks intensity.Even if he comes out in the town-hall debate on Tuesday with Ben Affleck charm, he has a Mitt Romney problem. Will it be the real Obama or will he just be doing what the media suggest and the base demands?"

  Here we go the bs of excuses from the likes of the Ditz.

  Now Dowd goes on the same old same old attack "Ryan, who was a toddler when Biden first came to the Senate, seemed a little green and shaky at moments — not showing the goofy cockiness captured in Time’s photos of his dumbbell workouts. Talking budget blarney, the Tea Party’s boy wonder once more proved that he can come up with a number for any purpose."

  Yeah Ditz he may be young and inexperienced but he held his own against Joe Bite me oh wait Ditz and liberals like yourself and the rest of you dumb asses in the lamestream media are never cocky and you want to talk about numbers how about the recently fudged up made up numbers from the Obama administration on the REAL UNEMPLOYMENT NUMBERS FOR SEPTEMBER.Ms.Ditz I would not be pointing any fingers sweetie.Oh and one other point it shows that Biden has been in power too long in our nations capital.

  She continues her assault of insults on Ryan "But he still clearly knew far less about the globe than both Biden and the moderator, Martha Raddatz, ABC News’s senior foreign affairs correspondent."Since when does being an ABC News senior foreign affairs correspondent make one an expert oh wait thats right Dowd covering for her buddy in the media.

 Here is more proof that Dowd has no friggin idea about what she is talking about "Ryan didn’t seem to understand what much of the world does: The administration has worked with allies to strengthen sanctions, which have turned Iran into an economic basket case."

 Oh ok Ditz you mean Obama apologizing to his Muslim comrades across the world for the U.S. to screwing up the killings on 9/11 of this year at our US Consulate in Benghazi,Libya by blaming a BS video instead of it being TERRORISM yeah real good work by the usual Poilitcally correct spin machine.

 So much for knowing what on e is talking about

 

NYT OPED Board Falls For Sceme

Opinion/Editorial
 

 I cannot believe these idiots this morning and how the New York Times Editorial Board can buy into this outright BS.These ideologues on the far far left always make the claim as to how much smarter they are than all of us if not everyone well this oped this morning shows how friggin stupid they can be.Its funny because they know damn well that their buddy Barack HUSSEIN Obama got his ass kicked in the debate the other night its also funny how before the debate last week that they the liberal media failed to mention about the September jobs reports was coming out this past Friday they were licking Obama's post debate wounds.
 The title of their third lead oped is "Better News on Jobs."I was under the impression that these idiots were more intelligent but this takes the cake.
 It begins "The September jobs report contains information with important consequences for government policy. But don’t expect Republicans to seriously engage with any of it, for two reasons. First, the report was stronger than expected, a development they are loath to acknowledge just four weeks before the election. Second, while the data suggests improvement, it also highlights the need for federal spending to maintain and create jobs, which Congressional Republicans have blocked and which Mitt Romney rejects."
 More attack attack attack.
 It goes on "Employers added 114,000 jobs last month, which would have been very disappointing but for upward revisions of employment growth for July and August, totaling another 86,000 jobs. The unemployment rate fell, from 8.1 percent in August to 7.8 percent last month, a welcome drop, though it appears to be partly due to a statistical fluke and partly to more part-time employment, which is better than no work, but hardly the sign of a reliably robust job market."
 Maybe the NYT can jump off a cliff to but that wont happen.Please check out on this blog my post of the true raw truth the data on the unemployment numbers that were FUDGED big time to make post debate Obama look better.
 The NYT attempt to believe the truth "What it does not reflect, as some conservative commentators have charged, is manipulation of the data by the Obama administration, an allegation that insults federal statisticians and only shows how desperately Republicans want bad economic numbers to use to attack the president. They seem to have little interest in promoting improvements that might actually help people."
 NYT defending their BIG GOVERNMENT buddies.

 
 

Even DNC Tv At MSNBC Doesnot Agree With The Numbers

Scarborough On Job Numbers: "These Numbers Don't Add Up"

   

Commentary

 

Talk about fuzzy math

   

Numbers Fudged Big Time 7.8% Yeah Right

 This is a funny one right after the debate and Obama's ass getting kicked all of the sudden the new numbers are out today.What numbers you ask? From the Bureau Of Labor Statistics The new Unemployment Numbers.As follows:


          

Economic News Release  

Employment Situation Summary

Transmission of material in this release is embargoed                   USDL-12-1981
until 8:30 a.m. (EDT) Friday, October 5, 2012

Technical information:
 Household data:       (202) 691-6378  *  cpsinfo@bls.gov  *  www.bls.gov/cps
 Establishment data:   (202) 691-6555  *  cesinfo@bls.gov  *  www.bls.gov/ces

Media contact:         (202) 691-5902  *  PressOffice@bls.gov


                    THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION -- SEPTEMBER 2012


The unemployment rate decreased to 7.8 percent in September, and total nonfarm 
payroll employment rose by 114,000, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported 
today. Employment increased in health care and in transportation and warehousing 
but changed little in most other major industries.

Commentary

Sorry I don't buy these fudged lying numbers they don't add up

Another Left Wing BS Excuse

First after the butt kicking Obama too k by RINO Mitt Romney the excuses were for example former Vice President the alleged inventor of the internet himself Mr.Global warming Al Gore blaming the air levels in Denver noew this all of the sudden by the left wing socilaist blog the Daily Kos.

Left Wing Conspiracy Theory: Romney Had Cheat Sheet At Debate

Left wing blogs claim Mitt Romney pulled a 'cheat sheet' out of his pocket as he approached the podium. His campaign says it is a handkerchief.

The liberal blog Daily Kos explains the theory here.

More Lies From Jon Stewart Cover For The Left

Jon Stewart Rips FOX News' Coverage Of Obama Race Tape

Daily Show: Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson expose an explosive 2007 video of Barack Obama echoing the racially-charged sentiments of notorious black liberation theologist George W. Bush.

Commentary

More about te BS issue of race in politics

Obama Coming Up With Excuses As To Why He Got His Ass Kicked In The Debate

Obama: I Didn't Debate "The Real Mitt Romney"

At a campaign rally in Denver on Thursday, President Obama hit Mitt Romney and said he didn't debate "the real Mitt Romney" on Wednesday night.

"The man on stage last night, he does not want to be held accountable for the real Mitt Romney's decisions and what he's been saying for the last year. And that's because he knows full well that we don't want what he's been selling for the last year," Obama said.

Commentary

Ok Mr.President which Romney did you face then (crickets chirping)

Chris Matthews Freaks Out Over Obama Debate Loss

Chris Matthews Freaks Out At Obama: "What Was He Do"Tonight wasn't an MSNBC debate tonight, was it?" Chris Matthews said after the first Obama-Romney presidential debate concluded on Wednesday night.

"I don't know what he was doing out there. He had his head down, he was enduring the debate rather than fighting it. Romney, on the other hand, came in with a campaign. He had a plan, he was going to dominate the time, he was going to be aggressive, he was going to push the moderator around, which he did effectively, he was going to relish the evening, enjoying it," Matthews said.

"Here's my question for Obama: I know he likes saying he doesn't watch cable television but maybe he should start. Maybe he should start. I don't know how he let Romney get away with the crap he throughout tonight about Social Security," Matthews complained.

Matthews then demanded that President Obama start watching cable news, specifically his program.

"Where was Obama tonight? He should watch -- well, not just Hardball, Rachel, he should watch you, he should watch the Reverend Al [Sharpton], he should watch Lawrence. He would learn something about this debate. There's a hot debate going on in this country. You know where it's been held? Here on this network is where we're having the debate," Matthews said.

"We have our knives out," Matthews said, admitting his network is trying their best to defend Obama and his policies. "We go after the people and the facts. What was he doing tonight? He went in there disarmed."

"He was like, 'Oh an hour and half? I think I can get through this thing. And I don't even look at this guy.' Whereas Romney -- I love the split-screen -- staring at Obama, addressing him like prey. He did it just right. 'I'm coming at an incumbent. I got to beat him. You've got to beat the champ and I'm going to beat him tonight. And I don't care what this guy, the moderator, whatever he thinks he is because I'm going to ignore him," Matthews said.

"What was Romney doing?" Matthews asked. "He was winning."

"If he does five more of these nights, forget it," Matthews added. "Obama should watch MSNBC, my last point. He will learn something every night on this show and all these shows. This stuff we're watching, it's like first grade for most of us. We know all this stuff."

NYT Commentary On US Supreme Court Opening Session

Opinion/Editorial

   The New York Times this morning opens up itself to commenting on the opening session of the highest ciurt in the land the U.S.Supreme Court.The title of this mornings lead OPED "October Term, 2012."
   It begins "On Monday, the Supreme Court opens a new term with a menu of important cases that deal with affirmative action, criminal justice, the right of defendants to effective counsel and more. The court may soon choose to hear a controversial case that could redefine voting-rights law, and, later in the term, one or more cases involving same-sex marriage."
  All of the liberal left wing tid bits that the NYT can delve into it seems.
  Here are some of the so called important issues that the editorial board of the NYT thinks are important issues:

     1.AFFIRMATIVE ACTION In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the court will address how and perhaps whether the university can take race into account as a factor in student admissions. In a way, the case is a rehearing of a 2003 case in which it ruled that the University of Michigan Law School could do so as part of assessing the whole of a candidate’s application. That decision seemed to reflect a national consensus that race, narrowly applied, could be used to ensure a diverse student body. The question now is whether the court will uphold that consensus — as we hope — or will further limit affirmative action.

   2.UNREASONABLE SEARCHES Two important cases involve the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. In Florida v. Jardines, the issue is whether the police violated the Constitution by using a dog trained to smell for drugs to sniff at the door of a house where they suspected marijuana was being grown. Was the sniff test unreasonably intrusive because there was no hard information that illegal activity was probably occurring, as the Florida Supreme Court properly found, or was it not a search because it occurred outside the house?

Similarly, in Missouri v. McNeely, the issue is whether the police could order a blood test on a man suspected of drunken driving without obtaining a warrant because the delay in doing so would result in loss of evidence. The Missouri Supreme Court sensibly ruled otherwise: that the test constituted an unreasonable search because there was no accident to investigate and because there was plenty of time to get a warrant and test the driver’s blood before the alcohol in it dissipated.

3.RIGHT TO COUNSEL Two cases involve the right of defendants to have effective counsel. Ryan v. Gonzales raises the question of whether the defendant himself needs to be mentally capable of assisting his own attorney in challenging a death penalty conviction. The answer, in our view, is yes. Chaidez v. United States asks whether a 2010 ruling of the court — that criminal defense lawyers must advise their noncitizen clients that a guilty plea carries the risk of deportation — applies to someone whose conviction became final before that ruling was announced. Again, the answer is yes.

   All those great left wing issues that the NYT believes is relevant to today.Issues of course that are not really relevant.

   It goes on to mention about voting rights act which of course they would be against showing ids to vote which is common sense."The court has not yet considered whether to take a highly contested case about the Voting Rights Act, but it may. A section of the act requires states and other jurisdictions with a history of racial discrimination to obtain clearance from the Justice Department or a court before changing voting procedures. Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. has already expressed his distaste for this provision. That provision is an essential safeguard against unfair voting procedures and enforces the core purpose of the 15th Amendment, and should be upheld.

  Of course voting rights are tied with racism good connection NYT.

  But to the NYT editorial board these aforementioned issues are critical to our nation dont hold your collective breathe.

Ryan Is Right On

Paul Ryan Likens Obama To NFL's Replacement Refs

PAUL RYAN: "I gotta start off on something that was really troubling that occured last night, did you guys watch that Packer game last night? Give me a break! It's time to get the real refs!

You know, it reminds me of President Obama and the economy! If you can't get it right, it's time to get out!

I have think that these refs work part time for President Obama in the budget office!

They see the national debt clock starring them in the face, they see a debt crisis and they just ignore and pretend it didn’t even happen. They are trying to pick the winners and losers and they don’t even do that very well.” (via FOX News Nation)

This is GREAT!

We Are No Better Off

Opinion/Editorial

   The question is are we better off as a nation as the United States Of America? This was the question posed this morning in the lead OPED in this mornings New York Times.It is entitled "The Better Economic Question."
   It begins "Democrats have been nervous about the inevitable election-year question, “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” Gov. Martin O’Malley of Maryland even stumbled over it a few days ago, saying “no,” before quickly blaming President George W. Bush.There is really no reason for any hesitancy. The country is unquestionably better off than it was in 2008. The economy has added 4.5 million private-sector jobs since January 2010; even if you subtract the vast job losses in the early months of President Obama’s term, before his policies went into effect, the country is still ahead by 332,000 private-sector jobs.

That level of job growth is close to the recovery following the 1990s recession, and it is actually stronger than after the early-2000s recession. But it doesn’t feel strong because the original hole was so deep and so many people are still suffering: 12.8 million remain unemployed.The contradiction between the plain facts of the data and the tepid feel of the recovery suggests that the recession created a more important question than the simplistic “are you better off?” Voters should ask themselves — and their leaders — how to keep this and future generations better off. How to prevent future recessions. How to design a tax code that promotes fairness and reduces inequality. How to make sure a safety net is in place for those who inevitably need more help."

   I wonder what the NYT has been smoking over the last four years.To be honest we are no better off because of the crap filled stimulus spending and Obamacare.I see that the hard left is stilling blaming Bush.

Where the NYT got their numbers about Obama's handling of the economy God only knows BS numbers no doubt.

  All we had over the last 6 years including Bush's TARP spending is more Government in our lives.There doesnot need to be a new tax code look to the Constitution.

  Here is an answer from the NYT "And when the question is phrased like that — looking forward rather than backward — it becomes obvious that the Republicans’ answer is inadequate."

  Neither is the grass any greener with the Democrats in charge as we saw from 08-10.

  Once again as I have posted before I am in no way going to defend Mitt Romney as well he is a bigger fraud than Obama

  

Both Are Frauds

  The question everyone is asking me from Facebook to everyone that I encounter on the street here in the steel city of Pittsburgh.Come the November election who am I voting for I reply good question because I have no idea but one thing I know for sure it won't be Barack HUSSEIN Obama.
  Mitt Romney the RINO nominee and Yes that's what  I am calling him he gave a Conservative like speech at the Republican National Convention in Tampa last week but that was not the man that was my Governor in my home state of Massachusetts from 2002-2006 who did the typical Massachusetts Republican cowering act to go along to get along in the Democrat legislative controlled state.
  People need to know that Mitt Romney along with the Democrat controlled Massachusetts state House and Senate passed overwhelmingly universal health care a.k.a "RomneyCare" the Father of now what is known as Obamacare.
  Romney also let the Massachusetts SJC (Supreme Judicial Court) literally burn the state Constitution and make law from the bench in a ruling having national ramifications on same sex marriage basically the court ordered the Legislature to make same sex marriage constitutional by voting on it in the current or next legislative session this was back in 2003-2004.There are two people guilty here at the time Gov.Romney and House Speaker Thomas Finneran (Finneran claimed that he was a blue-dog Democrat a.k.a a Conservative Democrat) didnot lift a finger to say the court over stepped its Constitutional duites in direct violation of the Separation of Powers act.Thus their ruling on same sex marriage should have been put out there by Romney and Finneran as UNCONSTITUTIONAL the court is not to make law.
 So for people that tell me Romney is better than Obama I say he is not.Both are cut from the same socialist modus operendi with an agenda that is far to the left.
  I know that I am going to piss off alot of some of the same folks who claim to know the Constitution but I am sorry I am about the truth.
  So as the saying goes people want to vote for the less of the two evils how can you when both are the same Im sorry but thats the cold hard truth

NYT Board Member Has It All Wrong

Editorial Board Member

  

Carol Giacomo

  Another thoughtless BS opinion from an Editorial board member of the New York Times."How Mr. Romney Would Force-Feed the Pentagon" is the title of her rant this morning.
  Just for the record this is no defense of Mitt Romney the RINO running for president.
  She begins her tirade "Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are portraying themselves as lionhearted budget-cutters, ready to slice out profligate spending in all sorts of government programs and services and lead America to lower taxes and lower deficits. Many experts say their numbers don’t add up, even if they were to impose all the cuts they want.Yet none of that philosophy seems to apply to the defense budget — which accounts for roughly half of all federal discretionary spending.Instead of proposing sensible and necessary reductions, they would throw more money at a Pentagon that has had a blank check for more than a decade. The base budget for 2013 — not including war-related costs — is projected at $525 billion, up roughly 34 percent from 2001. By 2022, Mr. Romney’s plan would increase annual spending to $986 billion, according to an analysis by Travis Sharp of the Center for a New American Security."
   First off a couple of points this chick is listed as a foreign affairs so she has no experience in the areas of the American military but to the NYT she is an expert give me a break second there are alot of BS that needs to be cut like welfare spending and frivolous Stimulus BS spending that needs to stop from this Obama administration that is bankrupting America.
  Here is what the NYT has this broad as listed on their website:

             

Carol Giacomo | Foreign Affairs

Carol Giacomo, a former diplomatic correspondent for Reuters in Washington, covered foreign policy for the international wire service for more than two decades before joining The Times editorial board in August 2007. In her previous position, she traveled over 1 million miles to nearly 100 countries with seven secretaries of state and various other senior U.S. officials. In 2009, she won the Georgetown University Weintal Prize for diplomatic reporting. She is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. In 1999-2000, she was a senior fellow at the U.S. Institute of Peace, researching U.S. economic and foreign policy decision-making during the Asian financial crisis. She has been a guest lecturer at the U.S. National War College, among other academic institutions. Born and raised in Connecticut, she holds a B.A. in English Literature from Regis College, Weston, Mass. She began her professional journalism career at the Lowell Sun in Lowell, Mass., and later worked for the Hartford Courant in the city hall, state capitol and Washington bureaus.

 So where is her experience in Military affairs she is nothing but a typical liberal NYT Editorial Board member her expertise spouting her anti-American venom out via the NYT Opinion Pages.
 Just another fraud and BS artist among the many at NYT.

NYT Commentary On Romney's Running Mate Paul Ryan



Opinion/Editorial



 Well the New York Times didn't waste any time by going after The eventual Republican Presidential nominee Mitt Romney's pick for Vice president.Their lead Oped is entitled "Mr. Ryan’s Cramped Vision" Romney's pick for VP was US Rep.Paul Ryan (R-Wisc) a lead CONSERVATIVE in the U.S.House. 

      I personally am no fan nor am I defender of one RINO Mitt Romney but I do have to admit that picking Paul Ryan was a good move and a far better choice than the establishment GOP favorite Gov.Chris Christie (RINO-NJ).
    The BS begins "Mitt Romney’s safe and squishy campaign just took on a much harder edge. A candidate of no details — I’ll cut the budget but no need to explain just how — has named a vice-presidential running mate, Paul Ryan, whose vision is filled with endless columns of minus signs. Voters will now be able to see with painful clarity just what the Republican Party has in store for them."
    Yeah painful to the left Rinos and the agenda at the NYT.
     It goes on "As House Budget Committee chairman, Mr. Ryan has drawn a blueprint of a government that will be absent when people need it the most. It will not be there when the unemployed need job training, or when a struggling student needs help to get into college. It will not be there when a miner needs more than a hardhat for protection, or when a city is unable to replace a crumbling bridge."
   I can live with less government or as the NYT puts it a government being absent.More BS from the NYT with lies.
   The NYT attacking the great Tea Party as well "And it will be silent when the elderly cannot keep up with the costs of M.R.I.’s or prescription medicines, or when the poor and uninsured become increasingly sick through lack of preventive care.More than three-fifths of the cuts proposed by Mr. Ryan, and eagerly accepted by the Tea Party-driven House, come from programs for low-income Americans. That means billions of dollars lost for job training for the displaced, Pell grants for students and food stamps for the hungry. These cuts are so severe that the nation’s Catholic bishops raised their voices in protest at the shredding of the nation’s moral obligations.
   Tea Party driven House no its ran by a RINO House Speaker John Boehner (RINO-Oh) and more scare tactics by NYT.What the NYT wants is continued support by the Government for frivolous BS spending "Mr. Ryan’s budget “will hurt hungry children, poor families, vulnerable seniors and workers who cannot find employment,” the bishops wrote in an April letter to the House. “These cuts are unjustified and wrong.”
   More class warfare too I love it keep it up NYT.
    This is what Mr.Ryan stated so eloquently "Mr. Ryan responded that he was helping the poor by eliminating their dependence on the government." Even the NYT had to comment on it with the usual excuse not to do the right thing "And yet he has failed to explain how he would make them self-sufficient — how, in fact, a radical transformation of government would magically turn around an economy that is starving for assistance. At a time when state and local government layoffs are the principal factor in unemployment, the Ryan budget would cut aid to desperate governments by at least 20 percent, far below historical levels, on top of other cuts to mass transit and highway spending."
    Once again I am in no way supporting Mitt Romney just by making a good and common sense pick as his running mate.