NYT Trying To Pin Point Conservatives

Opinion/Editorial

    As the saying goes you cannot teach an old dog new tricks.Stubborn as it is the New York Times this morning in one of their OPEDs is trying to do this by attacking the far right members of the US House.
   The OPED is entitled "A Breach of Trust."What trust one may ask?
   It begins here with their rant "The hard-fought deal that settled last year’s debt-ceiling fight made painfully deep cuts in spending, but it promised one thing: a year’s peace from the destructive Congressional battles that led to threats of government shutdowns and defaults. By signing the pact, Republican and Democratic leaders set spending levels for 2013, putting off further budget wars until after the election.But now a coalition of extreme conservatives in the House wants to break the budget agreement and cut spending below the agreed level, and the House Budget Committee seems willing to go along."
  I love it how the NYT puts it as if they are feeling the pain deep cuts in spending and its always a blame game on the Government shutdown which might be a good thing.Obviously the NYT is making reference to the Tea Party conservatives when they talk about the extreme ones.
  Here comes more of the blaming "Reneging on the agreement would not only endanger vital programs like Head Start, but it would erase the thin residue of trust left in Congress. It would clearly demonstrate that the current House cannot be trusted to live up to its own pledges.When Republicans created the debt-ceiling crisis in August, their principal goal was to cut spending, and they got their wish. By threatening a government default, they forced an agreement, negotiated by Speaker John Boehner, that cut $2.3 trillion from the budget over a decade without a dime of new taxes. That includes more than $800 billion cut from nondefense discretionary spending, in vital areas like education, housing assistance, transportation, public health and veterans benefits."
  Oh My God since when has the NYT ever stood up for Veterans here we go with more of their political game of chess.Cut ENTITLEMENTS SPENDING get lazty Democrat voters off of their collecting asses.
  Here comes more BS excuses on supposedly how cuts would efffect who "That $19 billion cut, on top of the ones already agreed to, could have terrible consequences. Assuming it was applied evenly to all nondefense programs, it would mean that 50,000 children would lose access to Head Start; 20,000 families would lose child-care slots; and 10,500 teachers and their aides would lose their jobs."   
  The children the children the children and bringing in the teachers BOOOOO WHOOOOO!
Cut more pork Tea Party members of the House lets drive the left and NYT more nuttier than they already are.